Title | Regenerative tourism: a state-of-the-art review |
---|---|
ID_Doc | 19 |
Authors | Bellato, L; Pollock, A |
Published | Tourism Geographies, , |
Structure | Here's the analysis of the article with each section described with two sentences: The abstract provides an overview of the article, stating that regenerative tourism is a concept that has evolved over time, but remains often misunderstood. The authors aim to provide a state-of-the-art review of the concept, clarifying its evolution, and synthesizing the critical misunderstandings of regenerative tourism. The introduction sets the stage for the article, highlighting the growing interest in alternatives to sustainable tourism and the need to understand the concept of regenerative tourism. The authors acknowledge the limitations of previous studies and the importance of clarifying the concept of regenerative tourism. The section explores the concept of regenerative paradigm, emphasizing the importance of living systems thinking and the ecological worldview. The authors discuss prominent thinkers and ideas that have shaped regenerative thinking, including Charles Krone, Capra, and the permaculture movement. The authors examine how regenerative concepts have been applied to tourism, including the work of Pollock and Bellato, who have contributed to the development of regenerative tourism approaches. They discuss the challenges of integrating regenerative thinking into tourism scholarship and practice. The section focuses on the concept of regenerative tourism economy, which centers economies and tourism at the center of enquiry and transformation. The authors discuss key proponents of this perspective, including Sheldon, Cave, and Dwyer. The authors highlight additional contributions to the regenerative tourism discourse, including Becken and Kaur's proposal of a tourism value conceptual framework using Te Ao Māori values, and Dredge's suggestions for transitioning towards regenerative approaches to tourism. The authors reflect on the current state of play in regenerative tourism, noting that it has diffused throughout the global community, albeit superficially, and is driven by a widespread hunger for solutions and fresh ideas. However, the authors argue that inadequate attention is paid to understanding the systems-changing implications of regenerative tourism. The authors outline three promising paths forward for advancing regenerative tourism scholarship, including the need for new ways of measuring tourism success, the importance of transdisciplinary research, and the potential for collaboration with diverse stakeholders. The reference section lists the sources cited in the article, providing a comprehensive bibliography for readers interested in exploring the topic of regenerative tourism further. The disclosure statement is empty in this case, as there is no potential conflict of interest reported by the authors. The section provides brief biographies of the authors, highlighting their background, expertise, and experience in the field of regenerative tourism. Overall, the article provides a comprehensive review of the concept of regenerative tourism, exploring its evolution, challenges, and potential for advancement. The authors offer promising paths forward for scholars and practitioners interested in applying regenerative thinking to tourism. |
Summary | Regenerative tourism is a concept that has gained recognition in recent years, but its meaning and application remain unclear. This review aims to clarify the concept by analyzing the emerging literature and discourse on regenerative tourism. Regenerative tourism is a paradigm shift in the tourism industry, focusing on restoration and regeneration of ecosystems, communities, and human well-being. The concept is rooted in the regenerative paradigm, which views life as a complex system of interconnected living systems. The review identifies key thinkers and ideas that have shaped the regenerative tourism concept, including Charles Krone, Donella Meadows, and Paul Hawken. Despite the growing interest in regenerative tourism, it remains misunderstood and oversimplified by many scholars and practitioners. The review argues that regenerative tourism should center on place and its communities to restore harmonious relations between humans and nature. Three dominant patterns stalling the required paradigm shifts in tourism are identified: linear reductionism, extractive growth, and hierarchies and concentration of knowledge. The review proposes promising paths forward for advancing regenerative tourism, including transdisciplinary research, collaboration with diverse stakeholders, and adopting regenerative literacy. Ultimately, regenerative tourism has the potential to transform the tourism industry and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable future. |
Scientific Methods | The research methods used in the article "Regenerative Tourism: A State-of-the-Art Review" by Loretta Bellato and Anna Pollock are not explicitly stated, but some patterns and characteristics can be observed. Here's a summary: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Some limitations and gaps in the research methods are apparent: 1. 2. 3. In conclusion, while the article does not explicitly outline its research methods, it appears to have employed a range of analytical and interpretive approaches, including literature review, critical discourse analysis, and in-depth case studies. However, there are also limitations and gaps in the research methods, highlighting the need for further methodological development and rigor. |
Article contribution | The article "Regenerative tourism: a state-of-the-art review" by Loretta Bellato and Anna Pollock contributes significantly to the field of regenerative economics. Here are some key points about the article's contribution: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Overall, the article contributes to the development of regenerative economics by: 1. Providing a comprehensive overview of the regenerative tourism concept and its relationship to the regenerative paradigm. 2. Identifying common misconceptions and distortions of the concept and emphasizing the need for a more nuanced and context-dependent approach. 3. Highlighting the importance of transformative shifts in thinking and practice, moving from linear reductionism to living systems thinking and from extractive growth to contributing to the health and well-being of places and communities. 4. Emphasizing the need for co-creating regenerative tourism approaches with diverse stakeholders. 5. Highlighting emerging trends and opportunities in regenerative tourism. The article's contribution can be seen in the following key areas: * Regenerative economics: The article contributes to the development of regenerative economics by exploring the concept of regenerative tourism and its relationship to the regenerative paradigm. * Sustainable tourism: The article highlights the importance of sustainable tourism and the need for a more nuanced approach to regenerative tourism. * Co-creation: The article emphasizes the importance of co-creating regenerative tourism approaches with diverse stakeholders, which is a key aspect of regenerative economics. * Social-ecological systems: The article highlights the importance of social-ecological systems thinking and the need to consider the relationships between tourism and broader social-ecological systems. |