| Title | Unpacking bio-based alternatives to ethylene production in Brazil, Europe, and the United States: A comparative life cycle assessment |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 10471 |
| Authors | Zanon-Zotin, M; Bergman-Fonte, C; Morais, TN; Maia, PLB; Carvalho, L; Angelkorte, G; Fiorini, ACO; Rochedo, PRR; Portugal-Pereira, J; Szklo, A; Schaeffer, R |
| Title | Unpacking bio-based alternatives to ethylene production in Brazil, Europe, and the United States: A comparative life cycle assessment |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Plastics account for 4.5% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which are hard-to-abate due to the use of fossil fuels as feedstock. Our study develops a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of bioethylene production, exploring 33 pathways across Brazil, the EU, and the US. It aims to understand whether substituting fossil-based ethylene with bioethylene contributes to lowering carbon emissions, and in which of the relevant bioenergy-producing regions/countries the valorisation of biofuels as feedstocks would provide a less carbon-intensive bioethylene production. Results indicate that bioethylene production through catalytic dehydration of sugar-cane bioethanol in Brazil presents lowest GHG emission. This pathway could deliver up to-2.1 kg CO2e/kg ethylene when accounting for biogenic carbon storage in long-lived applications such as infrastructure. In contrast, beef tallow performs the poorest as a raw material, regardless of whether land-use change (LUC) emissions are considered. When biogenic carbon storage is factored out, none of the pathways outperforms conventional fossil-based steam cracking; however, some are within the fossil-based range indicating potential indirect benefits through reduced refinery utilisation. Our study underscores that biomaterials production as a climate mitigation strategy must be on par with circular economy measures and the conservation of native forestry ecosystems. These results are particularly relevant to policymakers and industries seeking to align polymer manufacturing with sustainability objectives. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139376 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
29078
|
Kuznecova, I; Babica, V; Melecis, V; Baranenko, D; Ozarskis, M; Gusca, J Initial indicator analysis of bioethylen production pathways(2018) | |
| 69262
|
Mendes, FB; Volpi, MPC; Clementino, WD; Albarracin, LT; Moraes, BD An overview of the integrated biogas production through agro-industrial and livestock residues in the Brazilian Sao Paulo state(2023)Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Energy And Environment, 12.0, 6 | |
| 21647
|
Bishop, G; Styles, D; Lens, PNL Land-use change and valorisation of feedstock side-streams determine the climate mitigation potential of bioplastics(2022) | |
| 25483
|
Ali, SS; Abdelkarim, EA; Elsamahy, T; Al-Tohamy, R; Li, FH; Kornaros, M; Zuorro, A; Zhu, DC; Sun, JZ Bioplastic production in terms of life cycle assessment: A state-of-the- art review(2023) | |
| 33196
|
Chandel, AK; Forte, MBS; Gongalves, IS; Milessi, TS; Arruda, PV; Carvalho, W; Mussatto, SI Brazilian biorefineries from second generation biomass: critical insights from industry and future perspectives(2021)Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr, 15.0, 4 | |
| 26668
|
Hollas, CE; do Amaral, KGC; Lange, MV; Higarashi, MM; Steinmetz, RLR; Barros, EC; Mariani, LF; Nakano, V; Kunz, A; Sanches-Pereira, A; Jannuzzi, GD Life cycle assessment of waste management from the Brazilian pig chain residues in two perspectives: Electricity and biomethane production(2022) | |
| 26393
|
Nachtergaele, P; De Meester, S; Dewulf, J Environmental sustainability assessment of renewables-based propylene glycol at full industrial scale production(2019)Journal Of Chemical Technology And Biotechnology, 94, 6 | |
| 14261
|
Palm, E; Nilsson, LJ; Ahman, M Electricity-based plastics and their potential demand for electricity and carbon dioxide(2016) | |
| 14529
|
Pérez-Almada, D; Galán-Martín, A; del Mar Contreras, M; Castro, E Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessment of biorefineries: review and future research directions(2023)Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 7, 17 | |
| 27915
|
Bose, A; O'Shea, R; Lin, RC; Long, A; Rajendran, K; Wall, D; De, S; Murphy, JD The marginal abatement cost of co-producing biomethane, food and biofertiliser in a circular economy system(2022) |