| Title | Innovation realisation for digitalisation within Dutch small architectural practises: state of the art and future needs |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 12580 |
| Authors | Geoghegan, HJ; Jensen, FW; Kershaw, T; Codinhoto, R |
| Title | Innovation realisation for digitalisation within Dutch small architectural practises: state of the art and future needs |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Proceedings Of The Institution Of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement And Law, 176.0, 4 |
| Abstract | Advancing digitalisation and sustainability is a worldwide priority for the construction sector. With intertwined agendas, digitalisation enables the achievement of sustainable outcomes. That is the case of EU initiatives exploring Building Information Modelling (BIM) as a facilitator to Circular Economy (CE). Thus, standardising BIM implementation through the ISO 19650 information requirements represents a stepping stone towards CE and achieving better sustainable outcomes. Concerning standardisation, a unified digitalisation vision is under development for the European public sector as part of the European Green Deal. However, the European Union has already identified that the proposed digitalisation approach has had limited effect on extensively achieving sustainable outcomes. Amongst the issues is the high complexity that hinders small and medium-sized (SMEs) construction organisations from contributing. This problem is exacerbated by the limited amount of published scientific research evidence explaining how SMEs incorporate resource-hungry digital processes into their resource-limited business models. Therefore, to better understand the digitalisation for sustainability success cases within European SMEs, this paper presents the results of a state of the art (SOTA) literature review of academic articles, followed by a state of evidence (SoE) review of grey literature. The focus of the review is Dutch small architectural practices (SAPs). The results highlight the importance of projects information requirements for SMEs and the multi-faceted digitalisation challenges experienced by SAPs and building design SMEs. This paper also suggests future research areas focusing on innovation realisation (IR). |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
4012
|
Charef, R Supporting construction stakeholders with the circular economy: A trans-scaler framework to understand the holistic approach(2022) | |
| 16144
|
Atik, S; Aparisi, TD; Raslan, R Mind the gap: Facilitating early design stage building life cycle assessment through a co-production approach(2024) | |
| 61890
|
Braun, K; Kropp, C; Boeva, Y From Digital Design to Data-Assets: Competing Visions, Policy Projects, and Emerging Arrangements of Value Creation in the Digital Transformation of Construction(2022)Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung, 47.0, 3 | |
| 3469
|
Çetin, S; Gruis, V; Straub, A Digitalization for a circular economy in the building industry: Multiple-case study of Dutch social housing organizations(2022) | |
| 28667
|
Azcárate-Aguerre, JF; den Heijer, AC; Arkesteijn, MH; d'Alençon, LMV; Klein, T Facades-as-a-Service: Systemic managerial, financial, and governance innovation to enable a circular economy for buildings. Lessons learnt from a full-scale pilot project in the Netherlands(2023) | |
| 2031
|
Banihashemi, S; Meskin, S; Sheikhkhoshkar, M; Mohandes, SR; Hajirasouli, A; Lenguyen, K Circular economy in construction: The digital transformation perspective(2024) | |
| 2907
|
Ottosen, LM; Jensen, LB; Astrup, T; McAloone, TC; Ryberg, M; Thuesen, C; Lütken, S; Christiansen, S; Damo, AJ; Odgaard, MH Implementation Stage For Circular Economy In The Danish Building And Construction Sector(2021) | |
| 4008
|
Thirumal, S; Udawatta, N; Karunasena, G; Al-Ameri, R Barriers to Adopting Digital Technologies to Implement Circular Economy Practices in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review(2024)Sustainability, 16, 8 |