| Title | Drivers for design for deconstruction (DfD) implementation among design professionals |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 12815 |
| Authors | Pittri, H; Agyekum, K; Botchway, EA; Alencastro, J; Oladinrin, OT; Dompey, AMA |
| Title | Drivers for design for deconstruction (DfD) implementation among design professionals |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Smart And Sustainable Built Environment, 13.0, 5 |
| Abstract | PurposeThe design for deconstruction (DfD) technique, a contemporaneous solution to demolition by optimizing disassembly activities to enable reuse, has recently emerged with several promises to promote the circular economy. However, little attention has been given to its implementation among design professionals, especially in the Global South. Therefore, this study aims to explore the drivers for DfD implementation among design professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry (GCI).Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted a mixed research approach (explanatory sequential design) with an initial quantitative instrument phase, followed by a qualitative data collection phase. Data from the survey were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, one-sample t-Test, and normalization value (NV) test after a review of pertinent literature. These data were then validated through semistructured interviews with ten design professionals with in-depth knowledge of DfD.FindingsThe findings revealed that although all ten drivers are important, the eight key drivers for the DfD implementation were identified as, in order of importance, "Availability of computer software applications regarding DfD," "Inclusion of DfD in the formal education of design professionals," "Increasing public awareness of the concept of DfD," "Organizing workshops/seminars for design professionals on the concept of DfD," "Availability of DfD training," "Regulation regarding DfD," "Industry guidance regarding DfD" and "Establishing a market for salvaged construction components."Originality/valueThis study's findings provide insights into an under-investigated topic in Ghana and offer new and additional information and insights into the current state-of-the-art on the factors that drive DfD implementation. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
23027
|
Munaro, MR; Tavares, SF Design for adaptability and disassembly: guidelines for building deconstruction(2023) | |
| 23767
|
Roxas, CLC; Bautista, CR; Dela Cruz, OG; Dela Cruz, RLC; De Pedro, JPQ; Dungca, JR; Lejano, BA; Ongpeng, JMC Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) and Design for Deconstruction (DfD) in the Construction Industry: Challenges, Trends and Developments(2023)Buildings, 13, 5 | |
| 10358
|
Cruz-Rios, F; Grau, D Design for Disassembly: An Analysis of the Practice (or Lack Thereof) in the United States(2020) | |
| 25640
|
Balogun, H; Alaka, H; Egwim, CN; Ajayi, S Systematic review of drivers influencing building deconstructability: Towards a construct-based conceptual framework(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41, 3 | |
| 19518
|
Allam, AS; Nik-Bakht, M From demolition to deconstruction of the built environment: A synthesis of the literature(2023) | |
| 3090
|
de Lima, PRB; Rodrigues, CD; Post, JM Integration of BIM and design for deconstruction to improve circular economy of buildings(2023) | |
| 3147
|
Akinade, O; Oyedele, L; Oyedele, A; Delgado, JMD; Bilal, M; Akanbi, L; Ajayi, A; Owolabi, H Design for deconstruction using a circular economy approach: barriers and strategies for improvement(2020)Production Planning & Control, 31, 10 |