| Title | Approaches to implement safe by design in early product design through combining risk assessment and Life Cycle Assessment |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 12876 |
| Authors | Subramanian, V; Peijnenburg, WJGM; Vijver, MG; Blanco, CF; Cucurachi, S; Guinée, JB |
| Title | Approaches to implement safe by design in early product design through combining risk assessment and Life Cycle Assessment |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The Safe by Design (SbD) concept aims to ensure the production, use and disposal of materials and products safely. While there is a growing interest in the potential of SbD to support policy commitments, such as the EU Green Deal and the Circular Economy Action Plan in Europe, methodological approaches and practical guidelines on SbD are, however, largely missing. The combined use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Risk Assessment (RA) is considered suitable to operationalize SbD over the whole life-cycle of a product. Here, we explore the potential of the combined use of LCA and RA at Technological Readiness Level (TRL) 1-6. We perform a review of the literature presenting and/or developing approaches that combine LCA and RA at early stages of product design. We identify that basic early-on-evaluations of safety (e.g., apply lifecycle thinking to assess risk hotspots, avoid use of hazardous chemicals, minimize other environmental impacts from chemicals) are more common, while more complex assessments (e.g., ex-ante LCA, control banding, predictive (eco)toxicology) require specialized expertise. The application of these simplified approaches and guidelines aims to avoid some obvious sources of risks and impacts at early stages. Critical gaps need to be addressed for wider application of SbD, including more studies in the product design context, developing tools and databases containing collated in-formation on risk, greater collaboration between RA/LCA researchers and companies, and policy discussion on the expansion from SbD to Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD). |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137080 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
64897
|
Hristozov, D; Zabeo, A; Soeteman-Hernández, LG; Pizzol, L; Stoycheva, S Safe-and-sustainable-by-design chemicals and advanced materials: a paradigm shift towards prevention-based risk governance is needed(2023)Rsc Sustainability, 1.0, 4 | |
| 75539
|
Santucci, A; Esterman, M Environmental Impact Assessment During Product Development: A Functional Analysis Based Approach To Life Cycle Assessments(2016) | |
| 64427
|
Pizzol, L; Livieri, A; Salieri, B; Farcal, L; Soeteman-Hernández, LG; Rauscher, H; Zabeo, A; Blosi, M; Costa, AL; Peijnenburg, W; Stoycheva, S; Hunt, N; López-Tendero, MJ; Salgado, C; Reinosa, JJ; Fernández, JF; Hristozov, D Screening level approach to support companies in making safe and sustainable by design decisions at the early stages of innovation(2023) | |
| 19107
|
Hauschild, MZ; McKone, TE; Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K; Hald, T; Nielsen, BF; Mabit, SE; Fantke, P Risk and sustainability: trade-offs and synergies for robust decision making(2022)Environmental Sciences Europe, 34.0, 1 | |
| 6711
|
Peralta, ME; Alcalá, N; Soltero, VM Weighting with Life Cycle Assessment and Cradle to Cradle: A Methodology for Global Sustainability Design(2021)Applied Sciences-Basel, 11, 19 |