| Title | Agro-industrial wastewater-grown microalgae: A techno-environmental assessment of open and closed systems |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 13081 |
| Authors | Magalhaes, IB; Ferreira, J; Castro, JD; Assis, LRD; Calijuri, ML |
| Title | Agro-industrial wastewater-grown microalgae: A techno-environmental assessment of open and closed systems |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Microalgae-based treatment can be applied to the bioremediation of agro-industrial wastewater, aiming at a circular economy approach. The present work compared the technical-environmental feasibility of operating a bubble column photobioreactor (PBR) and a high rate pond (HRP) for microalgae biomass production and wastewater treatment of a meat processing facility. The comparison was made regarding biomass productivity, phytoplankton composition, treatment efficiency, life cycle assessment, and energy balance. The daily yields of total biomass and the maximum specific growth rates were 483.33 mg L-1 d(-1) and 0.23 d(-1) for PBR and 95.00 mg L(-1.)d(-1) and 0.193 d(-1) for HRP, respectively, with a predominance of the species Scenedesmus acutus. The treatment efficiency of COD (similar to 50%) and phosphorus (100%) were similar in the two reactors. However, the PBR showed greater assimilation of ammoniacal nitrogen (100% removal) due to the higher microalgal biomass productivity. Environmental impacts were assessed through the ReCiPe methodology for midpoint and endpoint levels. Results revealed that CO2 supply was the most impactful process for both systems (> 60%), but HRP reached lower environmental burdens (-105.90 mPt) than PBR (60.74 mPt). Energy balance through the Net Energy Ratio also resulted in the HPR advantage over the PBR (NER = 14.23 and 1.09, respectively). Still, both reactors present advantages when applied to different valorization routes. At the same time, both present room for improvement in the light of bioeconomy and biorefineries, aiming at sustainable wastewater treatment plants. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
3501
|
Vaz, SA; Badenes, SM; Pinheiro, HM; Martins, RC Recent reports on domestic wastewater treatment using microalgae cultivation: Towards a circular economy(2023) | |
| 6232
|
Li, G; Hu, RC; Wang, N; Yang, TL; Xu, FZ; Li, JL; Wu, JH; Huang, ZG; Pan, MM; Lyu, T Cultivation of microalgae in adjusted wastewater to enhance biofuel production and reduce environmental impact: Pyrolysis performances and life cycle assessment(2022) | |
| 24129
|
Morillas-España, A; Lafarga, T; Acién-Fernández, FG; Gómez-Serrano, C; González-López, CV Annual production of microalgae in wastewater using pilot-scale thin-layer cascade photobioreactors(2021)Journal Of Applied Phycology, 33, 6 | |
| 24747
|
Sarma, S; Sharma, S; Rudakiya, D; Upadhyay, J; Rathod, V; Patel, A; Narra, M Valorization of microalgae biomass into bioproducts promoting circular bioeconomy: a holistic approach of bioremediation and biorefinery(2021)3 Biotech, 11, 8 | |
| 12761
|
Catone, CM; Ripa, M; Geremia, E; Ulgiati, S Bio-products from algae-based biorefinery on wastewater: A review(2021) | |
| 24623
|
Mondal, S; Bera, S; Mishra, R; Roy, S Redefining the role of microalgae in industrial wastewater remediation(2022) | |
| 9882
|
dos Santos, AM; Deprá, MC; dos Santos, AM; Cichoski, AJ; Zepka, LQ; Jacob-Lopes, E Sustainability metrics on microalgae-based wastewater treatment system(2020) | |
| 23757
|
Uggetti, E; García, J; Alvarez, JA; García-Galán, MJG Start-up of a microalgae-based treatment system within the biorefinery concept: from wastewater to bioproducts(2018)Water Science And Technology, 78, 1 | |
| 29828
|
Chaudry, S Integrating Microalgae Cultivation with Wastewater Treatment: a Peek into Economics(2021)Applied Biochemistry And Biotechnology, 193.0, 10 | |
| 18730
|
Geremia, E; Ripa, M; Catone, CM; Ulgiati, S A Review about Microalgae Wastewater Treatment for Bioremediation and Biomass Production-A New Challenge for Europe(2021)Environments, 8.0, 12 |