Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Separate Collected vs. Mechanical Segregated Organic Fractions of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock
ID_Doc 13245
Authors Seruga, P; Krzywonos, M; Seruga, A; Niedzwiecki, L; Pawlak-Kruczek, H; Urbanowska, A
Title Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Separate Collected vs. Mechanical Segregated Organic Fractions of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock
Year 2020
Published Energies, 13, 15
Abstract The replacement of fossil fuel with renewable energy sources seems as though it will be crucial in the future. On the other hand, waste generation increases year by year. Thus, waste-to-energy technologies fit in with the actual trends, such as the circular economy. The crucial type of generated waste is municipal solid waste, which is in the research area. Regarding the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), anaerobic digestion (AD) allows the recovery of biogas and energy. Furthermore, if it is supported by source segregation, it should allow the recovery of material as fertilizer. The AD process performance (biogas yield and stability) comparison of source-segregated OFMSW (ss-OFMWS) and mechanically sorted OFMSW (ms-OFMSW) as feedstocks was performed in full-scale conditions. The daily biogas volume and methane content were measured to assess AD efficiency. To verify the process stability, the volatile fatty acid (VFA) content, pH value, acidity, alkalinity, and dry matter were determined. The obtained biogas yield per ton was slightly higher in the case of ss-OFMSW (111.1 m(3)/ton), compared to ms-OFMSW (105.3 m(3)/ton), together with a higher methane concentration: 58-60% and 51-53%, respectively, and followed by a higher electricity production capacity of almost 700 MWh for ss-OFMSW digestion. The obtained VFA concentrations, at levels around 1.1 g/kg, pH values (slightly above 8.0), acidity, and alkalinity indicate the possibilities of the digester feeding and no-risk exploitation of either as feedstock.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
14402 Zainal, A; Harun, R; Idrus, S Performance Monitoring of Anaerobic Digestion at Various Organic Loading Rates of Commercial Malaysian Food Waste(2022)
12352 Zainal, A; Harun, R; Yahya, L; Idrus, S Operational process stability in pilot dry anaerobic digester of source-sorted organic fraction municipal solid waste(2024)Asia-Pacific Journal Of Chemical Engineering, 19.0, 2
3603 Dhungana, B; Lohani, SP; Marsolek, M Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals(2022)Sustainability, 14, 6
9304 Dhull, P; Lohchab, RK; Kumar, S; Kumari, M; Shaloo; Bhankhar, AK Anaerobic Digestion: Advance Techniques for Enhanced Biomethane/Biogas Production as a Source of Renewable Energy(2024)Bioenergy Research, 17.0, 2
25868 Ragazzi, M; Maniscalco, M; Torretta, V; Ferronato, N; Rada, EC Anaerobic digestion as sustainable source of energy: A dynamic approach for improving the recovery of organic waste(2017)
10455 Sevillano, CA; Pesantes, AA; Carpio, EP; Martínez, EJ; Gómez, X Anaerobic Digestion for Producing Renewable Energy-The Evolution of This Technology in a New Uncertain Scenario(2021)Entropy, 23, 2
16570 Ellacuriaga, M; García-Cascallana, J; Gómez, X Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy(2021)Fuels, 2, 2
9768 Toufexis, C; Makris, DO; Vlachokostas, C; Michailidou, AV; Mertzanakis, C; Vachtsiavanou, A Bridging the Gap between Biowaste and Biomethane Production: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Methodological Approach(2024)Sustainability, 16.0, 15
15490 Azevedo, A; Lapa, N; Moldao, M; Duarte, E Opportunities and challenges in the anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sewage sludge and fruit and vegetable wastes: A review(2023)
5014 Rekleitis, G; Haralambous, KJ; Loizidou, M; Aravossis, K Utilization of Agricultural and Livestock Waste in Anaerobic Digestion (A.D): Applying the Biorefinery Concept in a Circular Economy(2020)Energies, 13, 17
Scroll