| Title | Consequential LCA of demountable and reusable internal wall assemblies: a case study in a Belgian context |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 13246 |
| Authors | Buyle, M; Galle, W; Debacker, W; Audenaert, A |
| Title | Consequential LCA of demountable and reusable internal wall assemblies: a case study in a Belgian context |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The transition from a linear to a circular economy is essential to reduce the environmental burden of our society. A key issue is to prevent a shift of the environmental burdens and take the consequences of a decision into account, for example based on a consequential life cycle assessment (LCA). However, limited practical guidance is available on how to implement consequential LCA in the context of the construction sector. Therefore, the aim of this study is twofold. First, to quantify the potential environmental and burdens of introducing circular design alternatives for internal wall assemblies to the Belgian market. Second, to review the methodological implications on the results of a consequential LCA with a particular focus on consistently identifying marginal suppliers and substitution routes, acknowledging the time dependence and closed-loop nature of the design alternatives. In total seven wall assemblies are assessed over a period of 60 years, with a refurbishment every 15 year. The results show that a low life cycle impact can be achieved for assemblies that are designed to be used again and have a higher initial impact, such as a plywood boarding connected reversibly to a demountable metal frame substructure, as well as for assemblies with no possibilities for direct reuse that have a low initial impact, such as a drywall system with a wooden substructure. Further, regarding the methodological scenarios on marginal supplier identification, the range of possible outcomes is however much larger for the demountable wall assemblies than for the conventional ones. |
| https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012057/pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
22444
|
Buyle, M; Galle, W; Debacker, W; Audenaert, A Sustainability assessment of circular building alternatives: Consequential LCA and LCC for internal wall assemblies as a case study in a Belgian context(2019) | |
| 4147
|
Eberhardt, LCM; van Stijn, A; Rasmussen, FN; Birkved, M; Birgisdottir, H Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Allocation Approach for Circular Economy in the Built Environment(2020)Sustainability, 12, 22 | |
| 5765
|
Kitayama, S; Iuorio, O; Josa, I; Borrion, A; Black, L Determining the carbon footprint reduction of reusing lightweight exterior infill walls: A case study of a school building in the United Kingdom(2024) | |
| 4538
|
Kret-Grzeskowiak, A; Baborska-Narozny, M Guidelines for disassembly and adaptation in architectural design compared to circular economy goals-A literature review(2023) | |
| 22428
|
Eberhardt, LCM; Birgisdóttir, H; Birkved, M Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly(2019)Building Research And Information, 47.0, 6 | |
| 27590
|
Rios, FC; Grau, D; Chong, WK Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment(2019) | |
| 5020
|
Hartwell, R; Macmillan, S; Overend, M Circular economy of facades: Real-world challenges and opportunities(2021) | |
| 8559
|
Rajagopalan, N; Brancart, S; De Regel, S; Paduart, A; Temmerman, ND; Debacker, W Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing in Circular Building Design: A Case Study for Wall Partitioning Systems in the Circular Retrofit Lab(2021)Sustainability, 13.0, 9 | |
| 20950
|
Krause, K; Hafner, A Relevance of the information content in module D on circular economy of building materials(2019) |