Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Contributions of extended batch tests for assessing technical recyclability: A case study of low-value battery flows
ID_Doc 13262
Authors Mählitz, PM; Korf, N; Chryssos, G; Rotter, VS
Title Contributions of extended batch tests for assessing technical recyclability: A case study of low-value battery flows
Year 2022
Published Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 26, 3
Abstract Good product recyclability is a prerequisite for the transition to a circular economy. However, today's product complexity and diversity in the urban mine result in heterogeneous and variable waste flows affecting process recycling efficiency (RE) and thus product recyclability. For batteries, waste flow composition and subsequent RE are determined by usage behavior, collection, and sorting into chemical battery subsystems. This study aims to demonstrate how extended batch tests (EBTs) can be used as a method to (a) determine battery-specific RE and (b) derive recommendations for assessing and improving the recyclability of batteries. Three EBTs comprising extensive characterization methods were carried out with mixtures of zinc-based (AZ) and lithium-based (LIB) batteries. The results showed that 0.20-0.27 kg/kg of the input mass was lost through flue gas and not recyclable. The metal fraction (0.15-0.19 kg/kg) was easily recyclable, while the mineral fractions of LIBs posed challenges for recycling and recovery (RR) due to the high elemental heterogeneity and pollutants originating from individual battery subsystems. In total, 0.79 kg/kg of AZs was recyclable, whereas 0.52 kg/kg of LIBs and 0.58 kg/kg of AZLIBs (a mixture of both) were recyclable after further treatment. In conclusion, the study demonstrated how the EBT approach can be used to extend recyclability assessment by providing waste flow characteristics for comparison with output quality requirements, enabling assignment of battery-specific RE and identification of poorly recyclable battery subsystems. Thus, the EBT approach can help improve and assess technical recyclability in the future.
PDF https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jiec.13250

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
22629 Tran, HP; Schaubroeck, T; Swart, P; Six, L; Coonen, P; Dewulf, J Recycling portable alkaline/ZnC batteries for a circular economy: An assessment of natural resource consumption from a life cycle and criticality perspective(2018)
15154 Luo, XL; Ding, N; Yang, JX; Lu, B; Ma, J Potential environmental benefits assessment of recycling based on multi-LCA and SFA(2024)
27341 Díaz-Ramírez, MC; Ferreira, VJ; García-Armingol, T; López-Sabirón, AM; Ferreira, G Battery Manufacturing Resource Assessment to Minimise Component Production Environmental Impacts(2020)Sustainability, 12.0, 17
18872 Rinne, M; Aromaa-Stubb, R; Elomaa, H; Porvali, A; Lundstroem, M Evaluation of hydrometallurgical black mass recycling with simulation-based life cycle assessment(2024)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 29.0, 9
22778 Doose, S; Mayer, JK; Michalowski, P; Kwade, A Challenges in Ecofriendly Battery Recycling and Closed Material Cycles: A Perspective on Future Lithium Battery Generations(2021)Metals, 11.0, 2
5960 Ali, H; Khan, HA; Pecht, MG Circular economy of Li Batteries: Technologies and trends(2021)
7361 Yang, Y; Okonkwo, EG; Huang, GY; Xu, SM; Sun, W; He, YH On the sustainability of lithium ion battery industry-A review and perspective(2021)
21614 Sommerville, R; Zhu, PC; Rajaeifar, MA; Heidrich, O; Goodship, V; Kendrick, E A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes(2021)
26813 Zhou, H; Li, W; Poulet, T; Basarir, H; Karrech, A Life cycle assessment of recycling lithium-ion battery related mineral processing by-products: A review(2024)
3026 Velázquez-Martínez, O; Valio, J; Santasalo-Aarnio, A; Reuter, M; Serna-Guerrero, R A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Processes from a Circular Economy Perspective(2019)Batteries-Basel, 5, 4
Scroll