| Title | Energy recovery and GHG impact assessment of biomass, polymers, and coal |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 13508 |
| Authors | Bourtsalas, AC |
| Title | Energy recovery and GHG impact assessment of biomass, polymers, and coal |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | In recent decades, rising energy consumption, population growth, and material production have contributed to environmental degradation. Harnessing the chemical energy in these materials in a circular economy can mitigate these issues. While recycling processes recover valuable constituents, significant post-recycling fractions remain viable for energy recovery. This study investigates the energy recovery potential from biomass materials via combustion, gasification, and anaerobic treatment, and from polymers and coal through combustion and gasification. Some materials not typically considered for combustion, such as food and green waste, are included due to their potential processing in combustion plants. Using thermodynamic principles, we assess the limits and opportunities for sustainable energy recovery across 200 materials, identifying correlations between the heating value and compositional analyses. The study also estimates the potential products and environmental impacts of energy production from these materials. Despite their lower heating value, biomass materials offer considerable net carbon reductions, but land use, water consumption, public health issues, and feedstock supply risks warrant consideration. Biomass combustion yields lower carbon emissions than polymer or coal combustion. Biomass and polymer gasification show high potential due to their higher H2/CO ratios. Anaerobic treatment of biomass materials generates significant methane, offering modest energy output. Synthetic polymers possess high heating values, comparable to fossil fuels, and provide net CO2 emission benefits, although substantially lower than those of biomass materials. Biomass combustion or gasification results in significantly lower NOx and SOx emissions compared to polymers and coal. Accounting for energy output, biomass gasification generates the lowest emissions per MJ. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
3497
|
Vela, IC; Vilches, TB; Berndes, G; Johnsson, F; Thunman, H Co-recycling of natural and synthetic carbon materials for a sustainable circular economy(2022) | |
| 14890
|
Williams, JM; Bourtsalas, AC Assessment of Co-Gasification Methods for Hydrogen Production from Biomass and Plastic Wastes(2023)Energies, 16, 22 | |
| 6979
|
Begum, YA; Kumari, S; Jain, SK; Garg, MC A review on waste biomass-to-energy: integrated thermochemical and biochemical conversion for resource recovery(2024)Environmental Science-Advances, 3, 9 | |
| 8448
|
Nandhini, R; Berslin, D; Sivaprakash, B; Rajamohan, N; Vo, DVN Thermochemical conversion of municipal solid waste into energy and hydrogen: a review(2022)Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20.0, 3 | |
| 21315
|
Sarma, RN; Vinu, R An assessment of sustainability metrics for waste-to-liquid fuel pathways for a low carbon circular economy(2023) | |
| 13396
|
Seah, CC; Habib, SH; Hafriz, RSRM; Shamsuddin, AH; Razali, NM; Salmiaton, A Prospective energy content assessment of waste biomass and polymer via preliminary analysis(2024) | |
| 17200
|
Gracida-Alvarez, UR; Benavides, PT; Lee, US; Wang, MC Life-cycle analysis of recycling of post-use plastic to plastic via pyrolysis(2023) | |
| 13111
|
Das, S; Liang, C; Dunn, JB Plastics to fuel or plastics: Life cycle assessment-based evaluation of different options for pyrolysis at end-of-life(2022) | |
| 26791
|
Cuevas, AB; Leiva-Candia, DE; Dorado, MP An Overview of Pyrolysis as Waste Treatment to Produce Eco-Energy(2024)Energies, 17, 12 | |
| 6563
|
Ye, YY; Guo, WS; Ngo, HH; Wei, W; Cheng, DL; Bui, XT; Hoang, NB; Zhang, HY Biofuel production for circular bioeconomy: Present scenario and future scope(2024) |