Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Energy efficiency of waste-to-energy plants with a focus on the comparison and the constraints of the 3T method and the R1 formula
ID_Doc 13779
Authors Vakalis, S; Moustakas, K; Loizidou, M
Title Energy efficiency of waste-to-energy plants with a focus on the comparison and the constraints of the 3T method and the R1 formula
Year 2019
Published
Abstract Managing the municipal solid waste (MSW) is a task that requires the combination of multiple strategies in order to follow the concept of circular economy. Waste-to-Energy (WtE) plants are producing electricity and heat but also have other byproducts that need to be disposed or can be reused. The standard method for assessing the WtE plants is the utilization of the R1 formula. The R1 formula has several limitations and is not able to integrate more parameters like the recovery of metals. The integration of the climate correction factor can improve the R1 up to 1.25 times but this factor is related to the Heating Degree Days, which is a rapidly declining value due to climate change. Contrary to the R1 Formula, the 3T Method is a novel method that can take into consideration all the range of products like syngas and biooil in a thermodynamically consistent way. These two methods were used to analyze three characteristic incineration plants and two gasification plants and this is the first time that this comparison is being presented. The results showed that the two methods have different ranges of returned values, with the R1 returning values (usually) between 0.5 and 1.1 and the 3T method returning values between 0.2 and 0.3. The 3T method on the one hand promotes high electrical efficiencies, i.e. 3T values approach the 0.3 mark for 30% electrical efficiency, and on the other hand promotes polygeneration where the recovery of char and metals can elevate the 3T value well above the 0.3 level for only 15% electrical efficiency and 70% metal recovery.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
12882 Isigonis, P; Moustakas, K; Vakalis, S Multicriteria analysis as a supporting decision tool for expanding the use of the 3T method for waste-to-energy technologies and biorefineries(2022)
18200 Fujii, M; Dou, Y; Sun, L; Ohnishi, S; Maki, S; Dong, HJ; Dong, L; Chandran, R Contribution to a low-carbon society from improving exergy of waste-to-energy system by upgrading utilization of waste(2019)
4319 Hoang, AT; Varbanov, PS; Nizetic, S; Sirohi, R; Pandey, A; Luque, R; Ng, KH; Pham, V Perspective review on Municipal Solid Waste-to-energy route: Characteristics, management strategy, and role in circular economy(2022)
74457 Khan, MS; Mubeen, I; Yu, CM; Zhu, GJ; Khalid, A; Yan, M Waste to energy incineration technology: Recent development under climate change scenarios(2022)Waste Management & Research, 40, 12
12766 Stepien, P; Serowik, M; Koziel, JA; Bialowiec, A Waste to Carbon Energy Demand Model and Data Based on the TGA and DSC Analysis of Individual MSW Components(2019)Data, 4.0, 2
10631 Galván, SL; Bielsa, RO Use of life cycle assessment for estimating impacts of waste-to-energy technologies in solid waste management systems: the case of Buenos Aires, Argentina(2024)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 31, 7
22661 Colangelo, G; Facchini, F; Ranieri, L; Starace, G; Vitti, M Assessment of carbon emissions' effects on the investments in conventional and innovative waste-to-energy treatments(2023)
9271 Santos, S; Nobre, C; Brito, P; Gonçalves, M Brief Overview of Refuse-Derived Fuel Production and Energetic Valorization: Applied Technology and Main Challenges(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 13
27728 Toro, ER; Lobo, A; Izquierdo, AG Circularity indicator for municipal solid waste treatment plants(2022)
69563 Rajaeifar, MA; Ghanavati, H; Dashti, BB; Heijungs, R; Aghbashlo, M; Tabatabaei, M Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: A comparative review(2017)
Scroll