| Title | A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Operational Phases of Three Selected Microalgal Cultivation Systems |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 14531 |
| Authors | Wimmerova, L; Keken, Z; Solcova, O; Vavrova, K |
| Title | A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Operational Phases of Three Selected Microalgal Cultivation Systems |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Sustainability, 15, 1 |
| Abstract | In recent years, microalgal biomass cultivation has been growing in importance, not only related to the production of alternative foods and nutritional supplements but also for its usage for energy purposes or as a natural solution for wastewater treatment. Regarding these cases, the practical potential associated with the circular economy is evident. However, this is not an option for microalgal food and supplements due to strict hygiene requirements for microalgae cultivation used for these purposes. Currently, the most common cultivation options for microalgae include phototrophic cascades, photobioreactors, and heterotrophic fermenters. Generally, the higher requirements for the purity of the resulting biomass, the higher the consumption of energy and nutrients needed. These are the main operational parameters that significantly shape the total environmental and economic performance of microalgae cultivation processes. The comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of environmental aspects in the operational phases of three selected cultivation systems, located in the Czech Republic and used for pure microalgae biomass production, confirmed that the impacts of these systems in the assessed categories are fundamentally dependent on the amount of electricity needed and nutrient consumption, as well as their sources. For this reason, the heterotrophic fermenter was evaluated as being the most damaging in the comparison of the three cultivation systems, while the phototrophic cascade showed a lower total environmental impact by 15% and the flat photobioreactor was lower still, by 95%, mainly due to energy production from biomass. The major impact categories observed were climate change, depletion of fossil fuels, human toxicity, and freshwater and marine ecotoxicity. The environmental impacts of microalgae cultivation systems could be further reduced if cycling practices, such as process water recycling and reprocessing of generated sewage sludge, were addressed. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
13081
|
Magalhaes, IB; Ferreira, J; Castro, JD; Assis, LRD; Calijuri, ML Agro-industrial wastewater-grown microalgae: A techno-environmental assessment of open and closed systems(2022) | |
| 6232
|
Li, G; Hu, RC; Wang, N; Yang, TL; Xu, FZ; Li, JL; Wu, JH; Huang, ZG; Pan, MM; Lyu, T Cultivation of microalgae in adjusted wastewater to enhance biofuel production and reduce environmental impact: Pyrolysis performances and life cycle assessment(2022) | |
| 24129
|
Morillas-España, A; Lafarga, T; Acién-Fernández, FG; Gómez-Serrano, C; González-López, CV Annual production of microalgae in wastewater using pilot-scale thin-layer cascade photobioreactors(2021)Journal Of Applied Phycology, 33, 6 | |
| 1801
|
Giwa, A; Abuhantash, F; Chalermthai, B; Taher, H Bio-Based Circular Economy and Polygeneration in Microalgal Production from Food Wastes: A Concise Review(2022)Sustainability, 14, 17 | |
| 24747
|
Sarma, S; Sharma, S; Rudakiya, D; Upadhyay, J; Rathod, V; Patel, A; Narra, M Valorization of microalgae biomass into bioproducts promoting circular bioeconomy: a holistic approach of bioremediation and biorefinery(2021)3 Biotech, 11, 8 | |
| 9882
|
dos Santos, AM; Deprá, MC; dos Santos, AM; Cichoski, AJ; Zepka, LQ; Jacob-Lopes, E Sustainability metrics on microalgae-based wastewater treatment system(2020) | |
| 3501
|
Vaz, SA; Badenes, SM; Pinheiro, HM; Martins, RC Recent reports on domestic wastewater treatment using microalgae cultivation: Towards a circular economy(2023) | |
| 22779
|
Rossi, S; Carecci, D; Proietti, L; Parati, K; Ficara, E Enhancing the environmental and economic sustainability of heterotrophic microalgae cultivation: Kinetic modelling and screening of alternative carbon sources(2024) | |
| 23792
|
Josa, I; Garfi, M Social life cycle assessment of microalgae-based systems for wastewater treatment and resource recovery(2023) | |
| 29392
|
Kumar, A Current and Future Perspective of Microalgae for Simultaneous Wastewater Treatment and Feedstock for Biofuels Production(2021)Chemistry Africa-A Journal Of The Tunisian Chemical Society, 4.0, 2 |