Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Combining organizational and product life cycle perspective to explore the environmental benefits of steel slag recovery practices
ID_Doc 14611
Authors Toniolo, S; Marson, A; Fedele, A
Title Combining organizational and product life cycle perspective to explore the environmental benefits of steel slag recovery practices
Year 2023
Published
Abstract Sustainability in steel production is considered a global challenge which needs to be faced with coordinated actions. The aim of this study is to assess the environmental improvements of a steel mill in a circular economy perspective, through the Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (O-LCA) and the Product Life Cycle Assessment (P-LCA) methodologies. This study explores to what extent the improvements and the efforts to recover the steel slag can be detected using an organization perspective and making a comparison with the more traditional product perspective. The results obtained show that the case in which the steel slag is recovered has lower impacts than the case in which it is landfilled through both O-LCA and P-LCA applications and that the percentage variations are similar for 8 categories out of 10 demonstrating that for our case study, O-LCA and P-LCA can detect the efforts to recover slag similarly. Two categories, namely ADP-minerals&metals and EP-freshwater, are affected by the greater amount of metal and mineral raw materials needed if the slag is not treated and by the steel slag landfill disposal more significantly. What the results tell us is that the variations obtained for this study in the P-LCA application are greater than those obtained in O-LCA application, due to two methodological aspects, namely the application of allocation procedures and the choice of the system boundaries. Finally, it emerges that O-LCA methodology can detect environmental improvements of circularity practices, but the reduction of the impacts is less clear than P-LCA application. What is transferable is that O-LCA and PLCA methodologies are not interchangeable to quantify the environmental benefits and address the efforts to improve a process in terms of circularity.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161440

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
4583 Antwi-Afari, P; Ng, ST; Chen, J; Oluleye, BI; Antwi-Afari, MF; Ababio, BK Enhancing life cycle assessment for circular economy measurement of different case scenarios of modular steel slab(2023)
1892 Broadbent, C Steel's recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy(2016)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 11
4580 Alejandrino, C; Mercante, IT; Bovea, MD Combining O-LCA and O-LCC to support circular economy strategies in organizations: Methodology and case study(2022)
2028 Walker, S; Coleman, N; Hodgson, P; Collins, N; Brimacombe, L Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy(2018)Sustainability, 10, 3
23129 Casazza, M; Barone, F Relevance of Environmental Factors in the Steel Life Cycle for a Transition toward Circular Sustainable Production and Consumption Systems: A Joint Bibliometric and Bibliographic Analysis(2023)Metals, 13, 3
13149 Renzulli, PA; Notarnicola, B; Tassielli, G; Arcese, G; Di Capua, R Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill(2016)Sustainability, 8, 8
21573 de Souza, HRA; Dantas, TET; Zanghelini, GM; Cherubini, E; Soares, SR Measuring the environmental performance of a circular system: Emergy and LCA approach on a recycle polystyrene system(2020)
16562 Hagedorn, W; Greiff, K; Pauliuk, S An environmental assessment framework for circular steel products(2024)
3306 Alvarez, CM; Ligthart, T A social panorama within the life cycle thinking and the circular economy: a literature review(2021)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, 11
13181 Daigo, I Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Materials(2022)Tetsu To Hagane-Journal Of The Iron And Steel Institute Of Japan, 108, 11
Scroll