| Title | Environmental and Economic Viability of Using Concrete Block Wastes from a Concrete Production Plant as Recycled Coarse Aggregates |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 14772 |
| Authors | Los Santos-Ortega, J; Fraile-Garcia, E; Ferreiro-Cabello, J |
| Title | Environmental and Economic Viability of Using Concrete Block Wastes from a Concrete Production Plant as Recycled Coarse Aggregates |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Materials, 17, 7 |
| Abstract | The construction sector must incorporate the circular economy to improve sustainability and efficiency. The use of recycled aggregates (RAs) as a substitute for natural aggregates (NAs) is currently being investigated and is expected to yield considerable benefits in the future. The objective of this research is to evaluate the environmental and economic benefits of using recycled coarse aggregates (RCAs) in different 1 m3 samples of concrete, substituting the natural coarse aggregate (NCAs) with RCAs in different percentages. RCAs generally come from the treatment of construction and demolition wastes (CDWs). However, in this research, the RCAs are the concrete block wastes (CBWs) generated by a concrete production plant. Among the most notable results is that compared to concrete with no RCAs, using alternatives in which RCAs have replaced 50% of the NCAs leads to an average decrease in impact category statistics of -3.30%. In contrast to the existing literature on the subject, the process of producing RCAs generated efficiency improvements in categories such as abiotic depletion of fossil fuels (-58.72%) and global warming potential (-85.13%). This is because the transport process, a key factor in determining the viability of using RAs instead of NAs, was eliminated. In economic terms, there is a slight decrease in the financial cost of producing 1 m3 of concrete as the quantity of RCAs increases. The maximum decrease was 0.23euro/m3 in the samples studied. Combining both the environmental and economic aspects resulted in a reduction factor of 0.420 g of CO2/eurocent, which means fewer CO2 emissions per unit cost when using RCAs. In conclusion, these results are intended to further knowledge in the field of using RAs instead of NAs in order to help the sector achieve sustainability and find an alternative use for a particular type of business waste. |
| https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071560 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
4001
|
Cerchione, R; Colangelo, F; Farina, I; Ghisellini, P; Passaro, R; Ulgiati, S Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete Production within a Circular Economy Perspective(2023)Sustainability, 15, 14 | |
| 9378
|
Elsheikh, A; Al-Zayadi, SK; Albo-Hassan, AS Experimental investigation of concrete incorporating recycled concrete aggregates(2024)Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 9.0, 6 | |
| 12545
|
Contreras-Llanes, M; Romero, M; Gazquez, MJ; Bolivar, JP Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Waste in the Manufacture of Urban Pavements(2021)Materials, 14.0, 21 | |
| 13496
|
Zhao, ZF; Courard, L; Groslambert, S; Jehin, T; Léonard, A; Xiao, JZ Use of recycled concrete aggregates from precast block for the production of new building blocks: An industrial scale study(2020) | |
| 15258
|
Dias, AB; Pacheco, JN; Silvestre, JD; Martins, IM; de Brito, J Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Assessment of Recycled Coarse Aggregates: A Portuguese Case Study(2021)Materials, 14, 18 | |
| 13000
|
Stengel, T; Kustermann, A Life cycle assessment of concrete made of 100% recycled aggregate compared to normal concrete(2024) | |
| 13481
|
Dias, A; Nezami, S; Silvestre, J; Kurda, R; Silva, R; Martins, I; de Brito, J Environmental and Economic Comparison of Natural and Recycled Aggregates Using LCA(2022)Recycling, 7, 4 | |
| 25022
|
Dias, S; Almeida, J; Tadeu, A; de Brito, J Alternative concrete aggregates - Review of physical and mechanical properties and successful applications(2024) | |
| 21532
|
Pacheco, J; de Brito, J Recycled Aggregates Produced from Construction and Demolition Waste for Structural Concrete: Constituents, Properties and Production(2021)Materials, 14.0, 19 | |
| 14246
|
Gerges, NN; Issa, CA; Sleiman, E; Aintrazi, S; Saadeddine, J; Abboud, R; Antoun, M Eco-Friendly Optimum Structural Concrete Mix Design(2022)Sustainability, 14, 14 |