| Title | Evaluation of Areca palm renewable options to replace disposable plastic containers using life cycle assessment methodology |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 15851 |
| Authors | Gautam, A; Mata, TM; Martins, AA; Caetano, NS |
| Title | Evaluation of Areca palm renewable options to replace disposable plastic containers using life cycle assessment methodology |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | In spite of raising awareness of the environmental impacts associated to the production and utilization of plastics, in many situations, the use of plastics is advantageous, and options are still unavailable or under development, representing an opportunity to develop more sustainable options, such as less energy intensive solutions. In this work, the LCA methodology is used to evaluate the environmental impacts of boxes, bowls and plates produced using Areca palm (Areca catechu) sheath, a waste material common in southern India. The inventory is a combination of primary data from a company in India, complemented with secondary data from the Ecoinvent v2.1 (Simapro V7.3). Results show that the main contributors to the potential environmental impact categories and the most energy intensive life cycle steps, are transportation, shipping and electricity generation. Carbon footprints of 1180, 1033 and 1090 kg CO(2)eq/ton were obtained for Areca boxes, plates and bowls, respectively. Plates made from Areca palm sheath have lower environmental impacts than plastic plates, except in the ozone layer depletion and terrestrial toxicity impact categories. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.023 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
25182
|
Neo, ERK; Soo, GCY; Tan, DZL; Cady, K; Tong, KT; Low, JSC Life cycle assessment of plastic waste end-of-life for India and Indonesia(2021) | |
| 25790
|
Atabay, D; Rosentrater, KA; Ghnimi, S The sustainability debate on plastics: Cradle to grave Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economical Analysis of PP and PLA polymers with a "Polluter Pays Principle" perspective(2022) | |
| 26699
|
Stefanini, R; Paini, A; Vignali, G Plastic Versus Bioplastic as Packaging for Sanitary Products: The Environmental Impacts Comparison(2024)Packaging Technology And Science, 37, 7 | |
| 16781
|
Thrän, J; Garcia-Garcia, G; Parra-López, C; Ufarte, A; García-García, C; Parra, S; Sayadi-Gmada, S Environmental and economic assessment of biodegradable and compostable alternatives for plastic materials in greenhouses(2024) | |
| 23490
|
Tua, C; Biganzoli, L; Grosso, M; Rigamonti, L Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable Plastic Crates (RPCs)(2019)Resources-Basel, 8, 2 | |
| 26501
|
Vlasopoulos, A; Malinauskaite, J; Zabnienska-Góra, A; Jouhara, H Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery(2023) | |
| 20844
|
Batista, T; Cansado, IPD; Tita, B; Ilhéu, A; Metrogos, L; Mourao, PAM; Nabais, JMV; Castanheiro, JE; Borges, C; Matos, G Dealing with Plastic Waste from Agriculture Activity(2022)Agronomy-Basel, 12, 1 | |
| 6166
|
Miller, SA The capabilities and deficiencies of life cycle assessment to address the plastic problem(2022) | |
| 4615
|
Venkatachalam, V; Pohler, M; Spierling, S; Nickel, L; Barner, L; Endres, HJ Design for Recycling Strategies Based on the Life Cycle Assessment and End of Life Options of Plastics in a Circular Economy(2022)Macromolecular Chemistry And Physics, 223, 13 | |
| 17052
|
Jeswani, H; Krüger, C; Russ, M; Horlacher, M; Antony, F; Hann, S; Azapagic, A Life cycle environmental impacts of chemical recycling via pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste in comparison with mechanical recycling and energy recovery(2021) |