| Title | Assessing Technical Options for Handling Packaging Wastes from Construction of a Solar PV Powerstation: a Case Study from a Remote Site |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 16446 |
| Authors | Guerin, TF |
| Title | Assessing Technical Options for Handling Packaging Wastes from Construction of a Solar PV Powerstation: a Case Study from a Remote Site |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Water Air And Soil Pollution, 231, 5 |
| Abstract | End-of-life packaging materials (EOLPM) present an important challenge from an environmental and financial perspective at utility-scale solar energy (USSE) sites. Reuse on-site represents, in particular for remote sites, a significant contribution to sustainable business practice as it provides a higher value end use when used to develop on-site mulch to enable soil improvement, reducing transport emissions (from the least preferred option of off-site disposal to landfill), reducing costs, and employing local contractors. The objective of the study was to enable on-site reuse, which was primarily achieved through chemical and physicochemical characterization of EOLPM streams; cardboard, and wood. Given the common occurrence of these materials in the rapidly growing renewable energy sector, it represents an important scope of work for the sector internationally. The methods used for characterization of the EOLPM, the first of its type reported, included a range of organic and inorganic chemical analyses, phytotoxicity testing, followed by an environmental and high-level (or initial) financial benefit cost analysis. Key scientific findings were that only trace concentrations of chemicals of potential concern (COPC) were detected; the material was not phytotoxic and has potential for soil improvement at the site, and the selected option of on-site reuse (of the materials as a mulch) had a global warming potential of 50 times less than the business as usual option (transport to landfill). The results also demonstrated the broader potential for using EOLPMs from USSE sites for soil improvement at remote locations rather than transporting offsite for disposal or reuse. Structural changes will need to be made to the way in which markets operate to achieve circular economy outcomes for these EOLPMs. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
16391
|
Guerin, TF Evaluating treatment pathways for managing packaging materials from construction of a solar photovoltaic power station(2020)Waste Management & Research, 38, 12 | |
| 20888
|
Mahmoudi, S; Huda, N; Behnia, M Multi-levels of photovoltaic waste management: A holistic framework(2021) | |
| 9843
|
Islam, MT; Iyer-Raniga, U Life cycle assessment of e-waste management system in Australia: Case of waste printed circuit board (PCB)(2023) | |
| 24724
|
D'Adamo, I; Ferella, F; Gastaldi, M; Ippolito, NM; Rosa, P Circular solar: Evaluating the profitability of a photovoltaic panel recycling plant(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41, 6 | |
| 25790
|
Atabay, D; Rosentrater, KA; Ghnimi, S The sustainability debate on plastics: Cradle to grave Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economical Analysis of PP and PLA polymers with a "Polluter Pays Principle" perspective(2022) | |
| 25597
|
Bala, A; Arfelis, S; Oliver-Ortega, H; Méndez, JA Life cycle assessment of PE and PP multi film compared with PLA and PLA reinforced with nanoclays film(2022) | |
| 3734
|
Meys, R; Frick, F; Westhues, S; Sternberg, A; Klankermayer, J; Bardow, A Towards a circular economy for plastic packaging wastes - the environmental potential of chemical recycling(2020) | |
| 7662
|
Bourtsalas, AC; Shen, TX; Tian, YX A Comprehensive Assessment of Products Management and Energy Recovery from Waste Products in the United States(2022)Energies, 15, 18 | |
| 24907
|
Antonopoulos, I; Faraca, G; Tonini, D Recycling of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in the EU: Recovery rates, material flows, and barriers(2021) | |
| 26620
|
Park, JY; Chertow, MR Establishing and testing the "reuse potential" indicator for managing wastes as resources(2014) |