| Title | Food waste recovery into energy in a circular economy perspective: A comprehensive review of aspects related to plant operation and environmental assessment |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 16653 |
| Authors | Ingrao, C; Faccilongo, N; Di Gioia, L; Messineo, A |
| Title | Food waste recovery into energy in a circular economy perspective: A comprehensive review of aspects related to plant operation and environmental assessment |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Food Waste (FW) is increasingly viewed as a resource to be diverted from landfilling. In a circular economy where FW management is developed sustainably, FW has great potentials to be recovered, through a set of technologies like Anaerobic Digestion (AD), into high-value energy, fuel, and natural nutrients. In this context, a comprehensive review of existing life cycle environmental assessments of FW recovery through AD was made and discussed in this paper, with the aim of finding key aspects related to plant operation, as well as to methodology application and Climate Change (CC) impact. Based upon the papers reviewed, AD resulted to be characterised by a biogas yield being equal to an average of around 120 m(3) t(-1) FW which increases to around 480 m(3) t(-1)FW in the case of co-digestion of FW with other biomasses, so underscoring the influence played by the feedstock used. CC-impact values were found as ranging between nearly 860 and 290 kg CO2 eq per ton of FW treated in AD, depending upon: the amount of feedstock treated; the amounts of products and by-products and the way they are modelled; and the method used for development of life cycle impact assessment phase. Results are highly affected by the methodological choices and assumptions that are made as part of the environmental assessment. Finally, negative CC-impact values were documented to be due to the environmental benefits resulting from the modelling of energy and material substitutes being greater than the environmental impacts associated with the actual treatment system. This can be considered as part of the substitution effect which is often considered and recommended in attributional LCAs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
21974
|
Slorach, PC; Jeswani, HK; Cuéllar-Franca, R; Azapagic, A Energy demand and carbon footprint of treating household food waste compared to its prevention(2019) | |
| 1784
|
Santagata, R; Ripa, M; Genovese, A; Ulgiati, S Food waste recovery pathways: Challenges and opportunities for an emerging bio-based circular economy. A systematic review and an assessment(2021) | |
| 17042
|
Oldfield, TL; White, E; Holden, NM The implications of stakeholder perspective for LCA of wasted food and green waste(2018) | |
| 6757
|
Oldfield, TL; White, E; Holden, NM An environmental analysis of options for utilising wasted food and food residue(2016) | |
| 28913
|
Slorach, PC; Jeswani, HK; Cuéllar-Franca, R; Azapagic, A Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy(2019) | |
| 4826
|
Loizia, P; Neofytou, N; Zorpas, AA The concept of circular economy strategy in food waste management for the optimization of energy production through anaerobic digestion(2019)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 26, 15 | |
| 13436
|
Valenti, F; Liao, W; Porto, SMC Life cycle assessment of agro-industrial by-product reuse: a comparison between anaerobic digestion and conventional disposal treatments(2020)Green Chemistry, 22, 20 | |
| 10389
|
Pérez-Camacho, MN; Curry, R; Cromie, T Life cycle environmental impacts of substituting food wastes for traditional anaerobic digestion feedstocks(2018) | |
| 21707
|
de Sadeleer, I; Brattebo, H; Callewaert, P Waste prevention, energy recovery or recycling - Directions for household food waste management in light of circular economy policy(2020) | |
| 26806
|
Styles, D; Yesufu, J; Bowman, M; Williams, AP; Duffy, C; Luyckx, K Climate mitigation efficacy of anaerobic digestion in a decarbonising economy(2022) |