| Title | Stakeholder perceptions on implementing design for disassembly and standardisation for heterogeneous construction components |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 16714 |
| Authors | Anastasiades, K; Dockx, J; van den Berg, M; Rinke, M; Blom, J; Audenaert, A |
| Title | Stakeholder perceptions on implementing design for disassembly and standardisation for heterogeneous construction components |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Waste Management & Research, 41, 8 |
| Abstract | The reuse of construction components is considered as a higher value process in a Circular Economy (CE) than recycling. However, this is not yet widely adopted as many barriers still prevent the successful integration of the concept. The ISO20887 standard advocates that the implementation of construction standards will benefit circular reuse. Yet, these standards still need to be developed. To better understand the views of the construction sector, a survey was sent to the network of the Green Deal on Circular Construction (GDCC), led by Circular Flanders. The survey (number of recipients = 629, response rate = 16%) investigates the current implementation of Design for Disassembly and the reuse of construction components. Additionally, it investigates the respondents' view on how a further morphological standardisation of components and connections, as well as standardisation of procedures can facilitate this reuse of construction components. The result is a concrete set of action points and corresponding actors who need to take responsibility. The stakeholders point out that there is no legal framework for component reuse. Yet, this framework can only be created through their largescale cooperation to create the needed construction standards that will truly enable the circular reuse of components. |
| https://research.utwente.nl/files/298735406/0734242x231154140.pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
17088
|
Anastasiades, K; Goffin, J; Rinke, M; Buyle, M; Audenaert, A; Blom, J Standardisation: An essential enabler for the circular reuse of construction components? A trajectory for a cleaner European construction industry(2021) | |
| 25585
|
Dams, B; Maskell, D; Shea, A; Allen, S; Driesser, M; Kretschmann, T; Walker, P; Emmitt, S A circular construction evaluation framework to promote designing for disassembly and adaptability(2021) | |
| 4538
|
Kret-Grzeskowiak, A; Baborska-Narozny, M Guidelines for disassembly and adaptation in architectural design compared to circular economy goals-A literature review(2023) | |
| 10358
|
Cruz-Rios, F; Grau, D Design for Disassembly: An Analysis of the Practice (or Lack Thereof) in the United States(2020) | |
| 22542
|
Rios, FC; Grau, D; Bilec, M Barriers and Enablers to Circular Building Design in the US: An Empirical Study(2021)Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 147.0, 10 | |
| 20198
|
Condotta, M; Zatta, E Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: Inconsistencies and possible improvements(2021) | |
| 10174
|
Ghaffar, SH; Burman, M; Braimah, N Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery(2020) | |
| 4260
|
Bellini, A; Andersen, B; Klungseth, NJ; Tadayon, A Achieving a circular economy through the effective reuse of construction products: A case study of a residential building(2024) | |
| 3571
|
Gillott, C; Mihkelson, W; Lanau, M; Cheshire, D; Tingley, DD Developing regenerate: A circular economy engagement tool for the assessment of new and existing buildings(2023)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 27, 2 | |
| 774
|
Mrad, C; Ribeiro, LF A Review of Europe's Circular Economy in the Building Sector(2022)Sustainability, 14, 21 |