Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Environmental and economic assessment of biodegradable and compostable alternatives for plastic materials in greenhouses
ID_Doc 16781
Authors Thrän, J; Garcia-Garcia, G; Parra-López, C; Ufarte, A; García-García, C; Parra, S; Sayadi-Gmada, S
Title Environmental and economic assessment of biodegradable and compostable alternatives for plastic materials in greenhouses
Year 2024
Published
Abstract Plastics and other materials commonly used in horticulture for plant support (e.g. raffia) and soil protection (e.g. mulching film) pose a challenge to achieving a circular economy. These materials contaminate plant residues, hampering their direct reuse due to the need for separation and cleaning. As a result, contaminated plant residues is often landfilled or incinerated. This study investigates the replacement of conventional plastic raffia and mulching film with biodegradable and compostable alternatives. Polypropylene raffia is compared with a biodegradable viscose polymer and compostable jute fibre, while polyethylene mulching film is compared with a biodegradable polylactic acid film. Conventional and novel alternatives are compared economically using LifeCycle Costing and environmentally using Life-Cycle Assessment. The economic assessment is based on case studies with two horticultural companies in Almeria (south-eastern Spain), while the environmental analysis uses data from the Ecoinvent database. The use of biodegradable and compostable alternatives for raffia and mulching film proved to be 49% more expensive than conventional options. However, when conventional plastic waste is incinerated rather than landfilled, biodegradable and compostable alternatives have a lower carbon footprint. Although biodegradable and compostable options can be more expensive and have higher impacts in certain situations, proper waste management can lead to environmental benefits. With optimisation and incentives, these alternative options support the transition of horticulture to a sustainable circular economy
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.12.049

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
13274 Feydeau, M Reduction of the environmental impact of the agronomic solutions of mulching and crops protection(2019)
25597 Bala, A; Arfelis, S; Oliver-Ortega, H; Méndez, JA Life cycle assessment of PE and PP multi film compared with PLA and PLA reinforced with nanoclays film(2022)
26699 Stefanini, R; Paini, A; Vignali, G Plastic Versus Bioplastic as Packaging for Sanitary Products: The Environmental Impacts Comparison(2024)Packaging Technology And Science, 37, 7
16507 Michaliszyn-Gabrys, B; Krupanek, J; Kalisz, M; Smith, J Challenges for Sustainability in Packaging of Fresh Vegetables in Organic Farming(2022)Sustainability, 14, 9
21647 Bishop, G; Styles, D; Lens, PNL Land-use change and valorisation of feedstock side-streams determine the climate mitigation potential of bioplastics(2022)
21658 Cascone, S; Ingrao, C; Valenti, F; Porto, SMC Energy and environmental assessment of plastic granule production from recycled greenhouse covering films in a circular economy perspective(2020)
64724 Cristóbal, J; Albizzati, PF; Giavini, M; Caro, D; Manfredi, S; Tonini, D Management practices for compostable plastic packaging waste: Impacts, challenges and recommendations(2023)
27697 Vigneswari, S; Kee, SH; Hazwan, MH; Ganeson, K; Tamilselvan, K; Bhubalan, K; Amirul, A; Ramakrishna, S Turning agricultural waste streams into biodegradable plastic: A step forward into adopting sustainable carbon neutrality(2024)Journal Of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 12.0, 2
25790 Atabay, D; Rosentrater, KA; Ghnimi, S The sustainability debate on plastics: Cradle to grave Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economical Analysis of PP and PLA polymers with a "Polluter Pays Principle" perspective(2022)
18337 Desole, MP; Gisario, A; Barletta, M Comparative life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis of coffee capsules made with conventional and innovative materials(2024)
Scroll