| Title | Life cycle environmental impacts of chemical recycling via pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste in comparison with mechanical recycling and energy recovery |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 17052 |
| Authors | Jeswani, H; Krüger, C; Russ, M; Horlacher, M; Antony, F; Hann, S; Azapagic, A |
| Title | Life cycle environmental impacts of chemical recycling via pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste in comparison with mechanical recycling and energy recovery |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | A large portion of plastic produced each year is used to make single-use packaging and other short-lived consumer products that are discarded quickly, creating significant amounts of waste. It is important that such waste be managed appropriately in line with circular-economy principles. One option for managing plastic waste is chemical recycling via pyrolysis, which can convert it back into chemical feedstock that can then be used to manufacture virgin-quality polymers. However, given that this is an emerging technology not yet used widely in practice, it is not clear if pyrolysis of waste plastics is sustainable on a life cycle basis and how it compares to other plastics waste management options as well as to the production of virgin plastics. Therefore, this study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impacts of chemical recyding of mixed plastic waste (MPW) via pyrolysis with the established waste management alternatives: mechanical recycling and energy recovery. Three LCA studies have been carried out under three perspectives: waste, product and a combination of the two. To ensure robust comparisons, the impacts have been estimated using two impact assessment methods: Environmental footprint and ReCiPe.The results suggest that chemical recycling via pyrolysis has a 50% lower climate change impact and life cycle energy use than the energy recovery option. The climate change impact and energy use of pyrolysis and mechanical recycling of MPW are similar if the quality of the recydate is taken into account. Furthermore, MPW recycled by pyrolysis has a significantly lower climate change impact (-0.45 vs 1.89 t CO2 eq.it plastic) than the equivalent made from virgin fossil resources. However, pyrolysis has significantly higher other impacts than mechanical recycling, energy recovery and production of virgin plastics. Sensitivity analyses show that some assumptions have notable effects on the results, including the assumed geographical region and its energy mix, carbon conversion efficiency of pyrolysis and recyclate quality. These results will be of interest to the chemical, plastics and waste industries, as well as to policy makers. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144483 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
20623
|
Stallkamp, C; Hennig, M; Volk, R; Richter, F; Bergfeldt, B; Tavakkol, S; Schultmann, F; Stapf, D Economic and environmental assessment of automotive plastic waste end-of-life options: Energy recovery versus chemical recycling(2023)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 27, 5 | |
| 2150
|
Sakthipriya, N Plastic waste management: A road map to achieve circular economy and recent innovations in pyrolysis(2022) | |
| 17200
|
Gracida-Alvarez, UR; Benavides, PT; Lee, US; Wang, MC Life-cycle analysis of recycling of post-use plastic to plastic via pyrolysis(2023) | |
| 26343
|
Davidson, MG; Furlong, RA; McManus, MC Developments in the life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste e A review(2021) | |
| 24213
|
Costa, LP; de Miranda, DMV; Pinto, JC Critical Evaluation of Life Cycle Assessment Analyses of Plastic Waste Pyrolysis(2022)Acs Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 10, 12 | |
| 13111
|
Das, S; Liang, C; Dunn, JB Plastics to fuel or plastics: Life cycle assessment-based evaluation of different options for pyrolysis at end-of-life(2022) | |
| 3185
|
Chawla, S; Varghese, BS; Chithra, A; Hussain, CG; Keçili, R; Hussain, CM Environmental impacts of post-consumer plastic wastes: Treatment technologies towards eco-sustainability and circular economy(2022) | |
| 24647
|
Qureshi, MS; Oasmaa, A; Pihkola, H; Deviatkin, I; Tenhunen, A; Mannila, J; Minkkinen, H; Pohjakallio, M; Laine-Ylijoki, J Pyrolysis of plastic waste: Opportunities and challenges(2020) | |
| 21326
|
Solis, M; Silveira, S Technologies for chemical recycling of household plastics - A technical review and TRL assessment(2020) | |
| 27077
|
Volk, R; Stallkamp, C; Steins, JJ; Yogish, SP; Muller, RC; Stapf, D; Schultmann, F Techno-economic assessment and comparison of different plastic recycling pathways: A German case study(2021)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 25.0, 5 |