| Title | On the intrinsic recycling potential of carbon-based materials and products; an assessment method and outlook |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 17214 |
| Authors | Bos, HL; van Es, DS; Harmsen, PFH |
| Title | On the intrinsic recycling potential of carbon-based materials and products; an assessment method and outlook |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | In this paper we investigate the market size of all materials and products presently produced from (organic) carbon and we present a method to estimate the intrinsic recycling potential of these materials/chemicals as a function of their respective applications. The method is based on the expert assessment of a number of variables that are important within the different application categories and markets of the carbon-based materials/ chemicals. Applying the method, the paper presents the recycling potential of all carbon-based products. Following, an estimation of the amount of new products that can be produced each year through recycling of discarded products is presented and the amount of carbon that needs to come from other sustainable sources to fulfil our demand for new products is calculated. We distinguish nine different categories of (organic) carbon-based materials/chemicals: plastics, textile fibres, thermoset resins, rubbers, surfactants, solvents, fine chemicals, paper/board and wood products. Within these nine categories the most important materials/chemicals types were taken into account. Fossil-based and biobased materials/chemicals were assessed separately. For each of the materials/chemicals types, the market size in terms of mass (Mt) was calculated for the main applications in which they are applied. Next, for all materials/chemicals types in these applications, the maximum recycling potential, in case mechanical or physical recycling methods are applied, was assessed, using an expert panel. Also, inevitable leakage of materials/ chemicals in the different applications was assessed. Finally, the amount of feedstock coming from recycling streams that may be made available for chemical recycling or carbon capture and utilisation technologies was derived. From this, the magnitude of carbon-based materials/chemicals that need to be replaced each year by other renewable feedstock than recycled content in terms of Mton carbon was calculated. The analysis is relevant in view of implementation of a circular economy and reuse and recycling of materials, to combat depletion of raw materials. Next, it is relevant in view of phasing out fossil-feedstock to combat climate change. Our analysis indicates that the recycling potential of carbon-based materials and products through mechanical or physical methods lies around 50%, even in a system that is fully optimised for recycling. Chemical recycling and carbon capture and utilisation may provide another 25% of the renewable-carbon feedstock needed, but they generally require far more energy and other inputs to produce new materials and chemicals than the mechanical and physical recycling methods. The remaining demand for renewable-carbon feedstock thus needs to come from either biomass or CO2 through carbon capture and utilisation technologies. Based on our findings, we argue that the composition of our present carbon-based products pool needs to be redesigned on a fundamental molecular level, towards material types that contain more oxygen. Carbon-based materials that contain more oxygen generally can be recycled more efficiently, and are also easier to produce from the alternative feedstocks biomass and CO2 through CCU. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142413 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
18008
|
Van Fan, Y; Cucek, L; Krajnc, D; Klemes, JJ; Lee, CT Life cycle assessment of plastic packaging recycling embedded with responsibility distribution as driver for environmental mitigation(2023) | |
| 3497
|
Vela, IC; Vilches, TB; Berndes, G; Johnsson, F; Thunman, H Co-recycling of natural and synthetic carbon materials for a sustainable circular economy(2022) | |
| 1892
|
Broadbent, C Steel's recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy(2016)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 11 | |
| 28793
|
Mastellone, ML Technical description and performance evaluation of different packaging plastic waste management's systems in a circular economy perspective(2020) | |
| 4772
|
Huysveld, S; Hubo, S; Ragaert, K; Dewulf, J Advancing circular economy benefit indicators and application on open-loop recycling of mixed and contaminated plastic waste fractions(2019) | |
| 29250
|
Schulte, A; Kampmann, B; Galafton, C Measuring the Circularity and Impact Reduction Potential of Post-Industrial and Post-Consumer Recycled Plastics(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 16 | |
| 20229
|
Birat, JP Life-cycle assessment, resource efficiency and recycling(2015)Metallurgical Research & Technology, 112, 2 | |
| 3054
|
Kubiczek, J; Derej, W; Hadasik, B; Matuszewska, A Chemical recycling of plastic waste as a mean to implement the circular economy model in the European Union(2023) | |
| 20623
|
Stallkamp, C; Hennig, M; Volk, R; Richter, F; Bergfeldt, B; Tavakkol, S; Schultmann, F; Stapf, D Economic and environmental assessment of automotive plastic waste end-of-life options: Energy recovery versus chemical recycling(2023)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 27, 5 | |
| 2976
|
Hidalgo-Crespo, J; Moreira, CM; Jervis, FX; Soto, M; Amaya, JL; Banguera, L Circular economy of expanded polystyrene container production: Environmental benefits of household waste recycling considering renewable energies(2022) |