| Title | Reducing the carbon footprint of ICT products through material efficiency strategies: A life cycle analysis of smartphones |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 17731 |
| Authors | Cordella, M; Alfieri, F; Sanfelix, J |
| Title | Reducing the carbon footprint of ICT products through material efficiency strategies: A life cycle analysis of smartphones |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 25, 2 |
| Abstract | With the support of a life cycle assessment model, this study estimates the carbon footprint (CF) of smartphones and life cycle costs (LCC) for consumers in scenarios where different material efficiency strategies are implemented in Europe. Results show that a major contribution to the CF of smartphones is due to extraction and processing of materials and following manufacturing of parts: 10.7 kg CO2,eq/year, when assuming a biennial replacement cycle. Printed wiring board, display assembly, and integrated circuits make 75% of the impacts from materials. The CF is increased by assembly (+2.7 kg CO2,eq/year), distribution (+1.9 kg CO2,eq/year), and recharging of the device (+1.9 kg CO2,eq/year) and decreased by the end of life recycling (-0.8 kg CO2,eq/year). However, the CF of smartphones can dramatically increase when the energy consumed in communication services is counted (+26.4 kg CO2,eq/year). LCC can vary significantly (235-622 EUR/year). The service contract can in particular be a decisive cost factor (up to 61-85% of the LCC). It was calculated that the 1:1 displacement of new smartphones by used devices could decrease the CF by 52-79% (excluding communication services) and the LCC by 5-16%. An extension of the replacement cycle from 2 to 3 years could decrease the CF by 23-30% and the LCC by 4-10%, depending on whether repair operations are required. Measures for implementing such material efficiency strategies are presented and results can help inform decision-makers about how to reduce impacts associated with smartphones. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
27539
|
Pamminger, R; Glaser, S; Wimmer, W Modelling of different circular end-of-use scenarios for smartphones(2021)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 26.0, 3 | |
| 1075
|
Moraga, G; Huysveld, S; De Meester, S; Dewulf, J Resource efficiency indicators to assess circular economy strategies: A case study on four materials in laptops(2022) | |
| 16151
|
André, H; Soderman, ML; Nordelöf, A Resource and environmental impacts of using second-hand laptop computers: A case study of commercial reuse(2019) | |
| 7636
|
Kouloumpis, V; Konstantzos, GE; Chroni, C; Abeliotis, K; Lasaridi, K Does the circularity end justify the means? A life cycle assessment of preparing waste electrical and electronic equipment for reuse(2023) | |
| 7898
|
Tecchio, P; Ardente, F; Marwede, M; Clemm, C; Dimitrova, G; Mathieux, F Ecodesign of personal computers: an analysis of the potentials of material efficiency options(2018) | |
| 10621
|
Mishima, K; Rosano, M; Mishima, N; Nishimura, H End-of-Life Strategies for Used Mobile Phones Using Material Flow Modeling(2016)Recycling, 1, 1 | |
| 1811
|
Canetta, L; Fontana, A; Foletti, M; Tschanen, M Sustainability assessment of various circular economy scenarios in the consumer electronics sector(2018) | |
| 1962
|
Leal, JM; Pompidou, S; Charbuillet, C; Perry, N Design for and from Recycling: A Circular Ecodesign Approach to Improve the Circular Economy(2020)Sustainability, 12, 23 | |
| 67983
|
Nunes, IC; Kohlbeck, E; Beuren, FH; Fagundes, AB; Pereira, D Life cycle analysis of electronic products for a product-service system(2021) | |
| 16748
|
Hischier, R; Böni, HW Combining environmental and economic factors to evaluate the reuse of electrical and electronic equipment - a Swiss case study(2021) |