| Title | Have countries moved towards sustainable development or not? Definition, criteria, indicators and empirical analysis |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 18406 |
| Authors | Zhang, S; Zhu, DJ |
| Title | Have countries moved towards sustainable development or not? Definition, criteria, indicators and empirical analysis |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Have countries moved towards sustainable development (SD) or not ? To answer the question, first, a new SD definition, i.e. "Achieving higher and more equally distributed well-being levels within ecological limits", is proposed. Second, based on the definition and from a global perspective, four criteria are established to judge whether countries have moved towards SD, which are: (1) well-being levels have been higher and more equally distributed; (2) levels of ecological consumption have been lower; (3) ecological capacities have strengthened; and (4) the Ultimate Efficiency, which is the efficiency of transforming ecological consumption into human well-being, has improved. Developing countries with ecological consumption below global average do not have to meet the second criterion. Third, the Happy and Equal Human Development Index, the Ecological Footprint and the Biocapacity are selected to measure human well-being, ecological consumption and ecological capacities, respectively and two consistent methods are used to measure the Ultimate Efficiency. The empirical analysis of 102 countries during 2011-2016 demonstrates that 19 countries have met the required four or three criteria and moved towards SD and that 12 countries have met none of the required criteria and moved against SD. The main contribution is to provide a clear SD definition, specific criteria and reliable indicators for measuring national performance and informing decision making on moving towards SD. Therefore, whether countries have moved towards SD or not can be judged and measured continuously and regularly. Future research needs to detailedly explore why countries have met or not met one certain criterion. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
70281
|
Krykun, V Sustainable Development And Ecological Responsibility Of Business(2016)Baltic Journal Of Economic Studies, 2, 1 | |
| 18941
|
Cibulka, S; Giljum, S Towards a Comprehensive Framework of the Relationships between Resource Footprints, Quality of Life, and Economic Development(2020)Sustainability, 12.0, 11 | |
| 69618
|
Jain, M; Nagpal, A Relationship Between Environmental Sustainability and Human Development Index: A Case of Selected South Asian Nations(2019)Vision-The Journal Of Business Perspective, 23.0, 2 | |
| 26354
|
Coscieme, L; Mortensen, LF; Anderson, S; Ward, J; Donohue, I; Sutton, PC Going beyond Gross Domestic Product as an indicator to bring coherence to the Sustainable Development Goals(2020) | |
| 33003
|
Lorek, S; Spangenberg, JH Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy beyond green growth and green economies(2014) | |
| 29925
|
Vitola, Z Measuring The Sustainability Of Economic Development In The Eu Countries: A Comparative Analysis Of The Existing Tools(2023)Entrepreneurship And Sustainability Issues, 11.0, 2 | |
| 10488
|
Calicioglu, Ö; Bogdanski, A Linking the bioeconomy to the 2030 sustainable development agenda: Can SDG indicators be used to monitor progress towards a sustainable bioeconomy?(2021) | |
| 76309
|
Bengtsson, M; Alfredsson, E; Cohen, M; Lorek, S; Schroeder, P Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency(2018)Sustainability Science, 13, 6 |