| Title | Assessing the efficiency of End of Life technology in waste treatment-A bibliometric literature review |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 19259 |
| Authors | De Almeida, ST; Borsato, M |
| Title | Assessing the efficiency of End of Life technology in waste treatment-A bibliometric literature review |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The current trends of waste present a global challenge pursuing sustainability. In response, recycling is broadly recognised as a solid strategy and the proper approach to attenuate the impact on the environment and human society. However, despite the current strides in recycling the remaining amounts of disposed products keep on increasing. Reversal of this trend is challenging, given the available recycling technology requires both, materials and energy, thus contributing to the depletion of resources. Therefore, for one aiming to cope with waste through recycling, efficient processes must be carefully selected. The current literature reveals a series of strategies, terminologies, processes and technologies, which may be confusing. The adopted methodology uses a bibliometric literature review to assess the available treatment of waste coming from End of Life (EoL) products, pointed out as successful strategies by recognised literature. The findings will deliver a framework of processes covering the different EoL strategies, their steps and processes. Thus, promoting a more sustainable waste handling due to the adoption of strategies and processes found more efficient, but yet reliable and available. In this sense, disruptive technologies are glimpsed as promising substitute solutions. The main contributions are. First, presents an approach for assessing diverse literature. Second, it identifies, clarifies, prioritises and delivers revised concepts and definitions to cope with waste more efficiently. Finally, summarises a vast amount of recycling processes along the EoL, revealing their precursors, constraints and also, the more efficient recycling processes with opportunities for future research. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
8211
|
De Almeida, ST; Borsato, M Extending the RIPEx exergy-based method for selecting End of Life strategy(2020) | |
| 19765
|
Dastjerdi, B; Strezov, V; Rajaeifar, MA; Kumar, R; Behnia, M A systematic review on life cycle assessment of different waste to energy valorization technologies(2021) | |
| 8818
|
Zorpas, AA Sustainable waste management through end-of-waste criteria development(2016)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 23.0, 8 | |
| 18933
|
Withanage, SV; Habib, K Life Cycle Assessment and Material Flow Analysis: Two Under-Utilized Tools for Informing E-Waste Management(2021)Sustainability, 13.0, 14 | |
| 69734
|
Del Borghi, A; Gallo, M; Del Borghi, M A survey of life cycle approaches in waste management(2009)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 14.0, 7 | |
| 9843
|
Islam, MT; Iyer-Raniga, U Life cycle assessment of e-waste management system in Australia: Case of waste printed circuit board (PCB)(2023) | |
| 3093
|
He, YF; Kiehbadroudinezhad, M; Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H; Gupta, VK; Peng, WX; Lam, SS; Tabatabaei, M; Aghbashlo, M Driving sustainable circular economy in electronics: A comprehensive review on environmental life cycle assessment of e-waste recycling(2024) | |
| 20622
|
Wang, X; Li, C; Lam, CH; Subramanian, K; Qin, ZH; Mou, JH; Jin, MS; Chopra, SS; Singh, V; Ok, YS; Yan, JB; Li, HY; Lin, CSK Emerging waste valorisation techniques to moderate the hazardous impacts, and their path towards sustainability(2022) | |
| 24169
|
Mannheim, V Perspective: Comparison of end-of-life scenarios of municipal solid waste from viewpoint of life cycle assessment(2022) | |
| 5729
|
Zhang, Z; Malik, MZ; Khan, A; Ali, N; Malik, S; Bilal, M Environmental impacts of hazardous waste, and management strategies to reconcile circular economy and eco-sustainability(2022) |