Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations
ID_Doc 19560
Authors Anshassi, M; Smallwood, T; Townsend, TGG
Title Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations
Year 2022
Published
Abstract From a GHG perspective, most LCA studies find incineration (MSWI) to be preferred over landfilling because of high energy recovery offsets. In some studies, however, landfilling results in less greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions than MSWI. We investigated using LCA, the landfill gas (LFG) collection efficiencies and waste composition that led to landfills resulting in less GHG emissions. Then, we explored what theoretical minimum lifetime gas collection efficiencies can be expected when following US LFG regulations. Only landfills with high LFG collection efficiencies (at least 81%) and recovery of methane for energy resulted in less GHG emissions compared to the management of the same waste stream in MSWI; required efficiency increased to 93% without LFG energy recovery. Expected theoretical lifetime LFG collection efficiencies were modeled in the range of 30-80%, with the lower rates associated with landfills having smaller input masses, high decay rates, and low concentrations of nonmethane organic compounds (C-NMOC). Our modeling found that only under a limited combination of conditions (e.g., high C-NMOC, high waste input rate, low decay rate) could a landfill expect to achieve a LFG collection efficiency as high as 80%, and that this value falls just under the 81-93% collection efficiency threshold needed for a landfill to result in less GHG emissions than MSWI. When exploring the influence of higher oxidation rates, changing decay rates, varying electricity grids, and inclusion of nonferrous metals recovery offsets the collection effciency range needed increased in nearly all cases; the electricity grid and nonferrous metals offsets had the greatest influence.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
19170 Anshassi, M; Sackles, H; Townsend, TG A review of LCA assumptions impacting whether landfilling or incineration results in less greenhouse gas emissions(2021)
3491 Luo, QL; Grossule, V; Lavagnolo, MC Washing of residues from the circular economy prior to sustainable landfill: Effects on long-term impacts(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41, 3
12215 Kwon, Y; Lee, S; Bae, J; Park, S; Moon, H; Lee, T; Kim, K; Kang, J; Jeon, T Evaluation of Incinerator Performance and Policy Framework for Effective Waste Management and Energy Recovery: A Case Study of South Korea(2024)Sustainability, 16.0, 1
13556 Mazzi, A; Sciarrone, M; Raga, R Environmental Profile Of Anaerobic And Semi-Aerobic Landfills Within Sustainable Waste Management: An Overview(2022)Environmental Engineering And Management Journal, 21, 10
26750 Powell, JT; Chertow, MR Quantity, Components, and Value of Waste Materials Landfilled in the United States(2019)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 23, 2
69563 Rajaeifar, MA; Ghanavati, H; Dashti, BB; Heijungs, R; Aghbashlo, M; Tabatabaei, M Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: A comparative review(2017)
14455 Sauve, G; Van Acker, K The environmental impacts of municipal solid waste landfills in Europe: A life cycle assessment of proper reference cases to support decision making(2020)
16872 Istrate, IR; Galvez-Martos, JL; Vázquez, D; Guillén-Gosálbez, G; Dufour, J Prospective analysis of the optimal capacity, economics and carbon footprint of energy recovery from municipal solid waste incineration(2023)
15776 Bui, LT; Nguyen, PH; Nguyen, DCM Methane emission quantification from municipal waste landfills: models and computer software-a case study of Long An Province, Vietnam(2022)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29, 28
24169 Mannheim, V Perspective: Comparison of end-of-life scenarios of municipal solid waste from viewpoint of life cycle assessment(2022)
Scroll