| Title | The potential for material circularity and independence in the US steel sector |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 20444 |
| Authors | Cooper, DR; Ryan, NA; Syndergaard, K; Zhu, YX |
| Title | The potential for material circularity and independence in the US steel sector |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 24, 4 |
| Abstract | Achieving a U.S. circular economy would reduce environmental impacts and increase material independence. This article calculates maximum recycled contents (RCs) and recycling rates (RRs) in an independent U.S. steel sector, and estimates the potential to displace current imports with recycled scrap that is currently destined for landfill, hibernating stocks, or export (LHSE). A U.S. dynamic material flow analysis (1880-2100) is conducted to estimate annual steel consumption and scrap generation. The results are coupled with a linear optimization model that minimizes primary steel demand while satisfying the volumetric and compositional demands of new consumption. The compositional analysis examines only copper content because it is of greatest concern to recyclers. The best estimate is that the maximum independent RR is already constrained by copper contamination. Without interventions, this maximum RR will gradually decline throughout the century. The annual consumption to scrap availability ratio (C2SR) will decrease from around 1.4 today. Concurrently, the maximum RC rises but then plateaus below 75% as the RR falls. This highlights a conflict in the conditions for a circular economy: a C2SR approaching unity is a necessary condition for a high RC but leads to fewer opportunities for scrap contaminant dilution, which decreases the RR. Improved product design for recycling and deployment of scrap refining technologies will be needed to reach higher RCs. In 2017, the mass of U.S. scrap destined for LHSE exceeded direct steel imports. Domestic recycling of scrap exports alone could have displaced 36% of direct steel imports, reducing the U.S. deficit by $5.5 billion. |
| https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jiec.12971 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
28174
|
Mackey, PJ; Cardona, VN; Reemeyer, L The Role of Scrap Recycling in the USA for the Circular Economy: A Case Study of Copper Scrap Recycling(2019) | |
| 16667
|
Ciacci, L; Fishman, T; Elshkaki, A; Graedel, TE; Vassura, I; Passarini, F Exploring future copper demand, recycling and associated greenhouse gas emissions in the EU-28(2020) | |
| 1892
|
Broadbent, C Steel's recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy(2016)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 11 | |
| 27201
|
Gorman, MR; Dzombak, DA An Assessment of the Environmental Sustainability and Circularity of Future Scenarios of the Copper Life Cycle in the US(2019)Sustainability, 11.0, 20 | |
| 22592
|
Gorman, M; Dzombak, D Stocks and flows of copper in the US: Analysis of circularity 1970-2015 and potential for increased recovery(2020) | |
| 2924
|
Born, K; Ciftci, MM The limitations of end-of-life copper recycling and its implications for the circular economy of metals(2024) | |
| 28536
|
Pauliuk, S; Wang, T; Müller, DB Moving Toward the Circular Economy: The Role of Stocks in the Chinese Steel Cycle(2012)Environmental Science & Technology, 46.0, 1 | |
| 23032
|
Pauliuk, S; Kondo, Y; Nakamura, S; Nakajima, K Regional distribution and losses of end-of-life steel throughout multiple product life cycles Insights from the global multiregional MaTrace model(2017) | |
| 22893
|
Zhu, YX; Cooper, DR An Optimal Reverse Material Supply Chain for US Aluminum Scrap(2019) | |
| 2092
|
Rahman, SMM; Kim, J Circular economy, proximity, and shipbreaking: A material flow and environmental impact analysis(2020) |