| Title | A Review on the Lifecycle Strategies Enhancing Remanufacturing |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 20532 |
| Authors | Fofou, RF; Jiang, ZG; Wang, Y |
| Title | A Review on the Lifecycle Strategies Enhancing Remanufacturing |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Applied Sciences-Basel, 11, 13 |
| Abstract | Remanufacturing is a domain that has increasingly been exploited during recent years due to its numerous advantages and the increasing need for society to promote a circular economy leading to sustainability. Remanufacturing is one of the main end-of-life (EoL) options that can lead to a circular economy. There is therefore a strong need to prioritize this option over other available options at the end-of-life stage of a product because it is the only recovery option that maintains the same quality as that of a new product. This review focuses on the different lifecycle strategies that can help improve remanufacturing; in other words, the various strategies prior to, during or after the end-of-life of a product that can increase the chances of that product being remanufactured rather than being recycled or disposed of after its end-of-use. The emergence of the fourth industrial revolution, also known as industry 4.0 (I4.0), will help enhance data acquisition and sharing between different stages in the supply chain, as well boost smart remanufacturing techniques. This review examines how strategies like design for remanufacturing (DfRem), remaining useful life (RUL), product service system (PSS), closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), smart remanufacturing, EoL product collection and reverse logistics (RL) can enhance remanufacturing. We should bear in mind that not all products can be remanufactured, so other options are also considered. This review mainly focuses on products that can be remanufactured. For this review, we used 181 research papers from three databases; Science Direct, Web of Science and Scopus. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
9971
|
Sitcharangsie, S; Ijomah, W; Wong, TC Decision makings in key remanufacturing activities to optimise remanufacturing outcomes: A review(2019) | |
| 29417
|
Fera, M; Caterino, M; Hartono, N; Turino, MA; Abbate, R; Manco, P; Miranda, S; Riemma, S; Macchiaroli, R Remanufacturing Decision-Making Tools: A State of the Art(2024) | |
| 10856
|
Lahrour, Y; Brissaud, D; Zwolinski, P The strategy for implementing remanufacturing process in a commercial enterprise, the case study of a French company(2019) | |
| 27751
|
Kerin, M; Pham, DT Smart remanufacturing: a review and research framework(2020)Journal Of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31.0, 6 | |
| 5225
|
Duberg, JV; Johansson, G; Sundin, E; Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J Prerequisite factors for original equipment manufacturer remanufacturing(2020) | |
| 23473
|
Mejía-Moncayo, C; Kenné, JP; Hof, LA On the development of a smart architecture for a sustainable manufacturing-remanufacturing system: A literature review approach(2023) | |
| 65616
|
Chierici, E; Copani, G Remanufacturing with Upgrade PSS for New Sustainable Business Models(2016) | |
| 6745
|
Yang, S; Raghavendra, MRA; Kaminski, J; Pepin, H Opportunities for Industry 4.0 to Support Remanufacturing(2018)Applied Sciences-Basel, 8, 7 | |
| 75781
|
Gehin, A; Zwolinski, P; Brissaud, D A tool to implement sustainable end-of-life strategies in the product development phase(2008)Journal Of Cleaner Production, 16, 5 | |
| 27499
|
Ferraro, S; Baffa, F; Cantini, A; Leoni, L; De Carlo, F; Campatelli, G Exploring remanufacturing conveniency: An economic and energetic assessment for a closed-loop supply chain of a mechanical component(2024) |