| Title | Scientists' warning to humanity: strategic thinking on economic development, population, poverty and ecological sustainability in the Mediterranean and beyond |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 20685 |
| Authors | Kopnina, H; Washington, H; Lowe, I; Irvine, S |
| Title | Scientists' warning to humanity: strategic thinking on economic development, population, poverty and ecological sustainability in the Mediterranean and beyond |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Euro-Mediterranean Journal For Environmental Integration, 5, 1 |
| Abstract | At present, leading international agencies such as the United Nations Environment Programme are largely focused on what they claim to be win-win scenarios of 'sustainable development' rhetoric. These combine social, economic and environmental objectives. However, as noted in the World Scientists' Warning to Humanity, environmental integrity is essential for the healthy functioning of social and economic systems, and thus environmental protection needs to be prioritized in policy and practice. Ecological sustainability cannot be reached without realizing that population growth and economic growth, with attendant increased rates of depletion of natural resources, pollution and general environmental degradation, are the root causes of unsustainability. This article argues that to strategically address ecological unsustainability, the social, economic and political barriers to addressing the current economic model and population growth need to be overcome. Proposed strategic solutions to the current neoliberal economy are generic, namely degrowth, a steady-state economy, and a 'circular economy'. Solutions to demographic issues must be sensitive to the countries' cultural, social, political and economic factors to be effective, as fertility differs from country to country and from culture to culture. As discussed here, Mediterranean countries have the lowest fertilities in the world, while many countries in Africa and some in Asia and South America have stable but consistently high birthrates. This is discussed using three case studies-Tanzania, Italy and Cambodia, focusing on 'best case' policies that offer a more realistic hope for successful sustainability. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
79410
|
Spangenberg, JH World civilisations at crossroads: Towards an expansionist or a sustainable future-Lessons from history(2010)Futures, 42.0, 6 | |
| 33450
|
Saliba, P Sustainable Economic Development: Green Economy and Green Growth. Analysing Economic Growth and Identifying Sensible Measures Addressing Socio and Environmental Concerns Whilst Promoting Green Growth(2017) | |
| 25122
|
D'Amato, D; Droste, N; Winkler, KJ; Toppinen, A Thinking green, circular or bio: Eliciting researchers' perspectives on a sustainable economy with Q method(2019) | |
| 68011
|
Hepburn, C; Beinhocker, E; Farmer, JD; Teytelboym, A Resilient and Inclusive Prosperity within Planetary Boundaries(2014)China & World Economy, 22, 5 | |
| 70281
|
Krykun, V Sustainable Development And Ecological Responsibility Of Business(2016)Baltic Journal Of Economic Studies, 2, 1 | |
| 1364
|
Schröder, P; Lemille, A; Desmond, P Making the circular economy work for human development(2020) | |
| 74205
|
Johnston, P; Everard, M; Santillo, D; Robèrt, KH Reclaiming the definition of sustainability(2007)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 14, 1 | |
| 2351
|
Stephenson, PJ; Damerell, A Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability(2022)Sustainability, 14, 17 |