Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Intermediate bulk containers re-use in the circular economy: an LCA evaluation
ID_Doc 2078
Authors Biganzoli, L; Rigamonti, L; Grosso, M
Title Intermediate bulk containers re-use in the circular economy: an LCA evaluation
Year 2018
Published
Abstract The transition towards a circular economy, where the value of products, materials and resources is maintained for as long as possible, is an essential contribution to the European Union's efforts to develop a sustainable economy. Re-use of packaging items plays a key role in the achievement of this goal. The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impacts associated to the life cycle of Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs) as the number of uses (the so-called "rotations") changes, by using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The results of the contribution analysis show that the impacts of the life cycle of IBCs mainly come from the IBCs manufacturing, whereas the reconditioning process accounts for less than 20% of the overall impacts. Moreover, the system where IBCs are reconditioned and re-used has better environmental performance than the system where IBCs are used only once and then sent to recycling/disposal. The advantages of such a system increase with the number of rotations. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.010

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
24042 Biganzoli, L; Rigamonti, L; Grosso, M LCA evaluation of packaging re-use: the steel drums case study(2019)Journal Of Material Cycles And Waste Management, 21, 1
4003 Sazdovski, I; Bala, A; Fullana-i-Palmer, P Linking LCA literature with circular economy value creation: A review on beverage packaging(2021)
23490 Tua, C; Biganzoli, L; Grosso, M; Rigamonti, L Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable Plastic Crates (RPCs)(2019)Resources-Basel, 8, 2
21105 Sazdovski, I; Batlle-Bayer, L; Bala, A; Margallo, M; Azarkamand, S; Aldaco, R; Fullana-i-Palmer, P Comparative assessment of two circularity indicators for the case of reusable versus single-use secondary packages for fresh foods in Spain(2024)Heliyon, 10.0, 6
5596 Niero, M; Olsen, SI Circular economy: To be or not to be in a closed product loop? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements(2016)
16812 Tallentire, CW; Steubing, B The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe(2020)
4615 Venkatachalam, V; Pohler, M; Spierling, S; Nickel, L; Barner, L; Endres, HJ Design for Recycling Strategies Based on the Life Cycle Assessment and End of Life Options of Plastics in a Circular Economy(2022)Macromolecular Chemistry And Physics, 223, 13
22280 Niero, M; Hauschild, MZ; Hoffmeyer, SB; Olsen, SI Combining Eco-Efficiency and Eco-Effectiveness for Continuous Loop Beverage Packaging Systems Lessons from the Carlsberg Circular Community(2017)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21.0, 3
4772 Huysveld, S; Hubo, S; Ragaert, K; Dewulf, J Advancing circular economy benefit indicators and application on open-loop recycling of mixed and contaminated plastic waste fractions(2019)
22281 Cottafava, D; Costamagna, M; Baricco, M; Corazza, L; Miceli, D; Riccardo, LE Assessment of the environmental break-even point for deposit return systems through an LCA analysis of single-use and reusable cups(2021)
Scroll