| Title | Comparative assessment of two circularity indicators for the case of reusable versus single-use secondary packages for fresh foods in Spain |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 21105 |
| Authors | Sazdovski, I; Batlle-Bayer, L; Bala, A; Margallo, M; Azarkamand, S; Aldaco, R; Fullana-i-Palmer, P |
| Title | Comparative assessment of two circularity indicators for the case of reusable versus single-use secondary packages for fresh foods in Spain |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Heliyon, 10.0, 6 |
| Abstract | Sustainable packaging is a crucial focus in the context of circular economy efforts. This study evaluates the circularity of two secondary packaging systems used in Spanish fresh food produces: Reusable Plastic Crates and Single-use Cardboard Boxes. A Mass Flow Analysis was performed to assess the material flows in the production and use phases of both systems and two circular indicators were applied: the Material Circularity Indicator and Product Circular Indicator. While most previous studies for single-use packaging use these indicators at the product level, this study applies a system approach since the Reusable Plastic Crates can be reused 100 times. The functional unit was defined as the distribution of 1000 tonnes of fresh products, resulting in the distribution of 6,666,700 packages with 15 kg of products. The Material Circularity Indicator and Product Circular Indicator results show that Reusable Plastic Crates are more circular than Singleuse Cardboard Boxes. The Product Circular Indicator provides a more comprehensive assessment of circularity by considering multiple life cycle stages, efficiency, and unrecoverable waste, resulting in a difference in circularity evaluations. The indicators used have limitations as they do not consider the resource stock. Further research is needed to explore this aspect. |
| http://www.cell.com/article/S2405844024039537/pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
23490
|
Tua, C; Biganzoli, L; Grosso, M; Rigamonti, L Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable Plastic Crates (RPCs)(2019)Resources-Basel, 8, 2 | |
| 20803
|
Poças, F; Selbourne, MD Drivers, advances, and significance of measures for effective circular food packaging(2023) | |
| 2078
|
Biganzoli, L; Rigamonti, L; Grosso, M Intermediate bulk containers re-use in the circular economy: an LCA evaluation(2018) | |
| 21778
|
Pauer, E; Wohner, B; Heinrich, V; Tacker, M Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment(2019)Sustainability, 11.0, 3 | |
| 16675
|
Gonçalves, M; Freire, F; Garcia, R Material flow analysis and circularity assessment of plastic packaging: An application to Portugal(2024) | |
| 21750
|
Ada, E; Kazancoglu, Y; Lafci, Ç; Ekren, BY; Çelik, CÇ Identifying the Drivers of Circular Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review for the Current State of the Food Supply Chain to Be Sustainable and Circular(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 15 | |
| 424
|
Zhu, ZC; Liu, W; Ye, SH; Batista, L Packaging design for the circular economy: A systematic review(2022) | |
| 5294
|
Lombardi, M; Rana, R; Fellner, J Material flow analysis and sustainability of the Italian plastic packaging management(2021) | |
| 22698
|
Vadoudi, K; Deckers, P; Demuytere, C; Askanian, H; Verney, V Comparing a material circularity indicator to life cycle assessment: The case of a three-layer plastic packaging(2022) | |
| 28625
|
Rivera, XCS; Leadley, C; Potter, L; Azapagic, A Aiding the Design of Innovative and Sustainable Food Packaging: Integrating Techno-Environmental and Circular Economy Criteria(2019) |