Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Carbon footprint associated with two organic waste management: tunnel composting system versus landfill
ID_Doc 21134
Authors Grossi, G; Bernini, R; Lacetera, N; Vona, T; Papaleo, F; Vitali, A
Title Carbon footprint associated with two organic waste management: tunnel composting system versus landfill
Year 2024
Published International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology, 21.0, 6
Abstract This study assesses the environmental impact of a tunnel composting system, quantifying greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sinks of compost throughout its life cycle and comparing outcomes to an alternative sanitary landfill scenario. The research applies a carbon footprint method incorporating the burden of waste input biomass, a key innovation particularly important in the circular economy thinking where organic waste is seen as a valuable resource. The functional unit was one ton of unpackaged compost. The greenhouse gas emissions were quantified using SimaPro software and the Ecoinvent database, supplementing with literature data for processes not covered in the database. Uncertainty analysis, supported by Monte Carlo simulations, was conducted on various parameters, while uncertainties related to biological processes, such as composting and soil emissions and sinks, were specifically addressed through sensitivity analysis. One ton of compost resulted in 453 +/- 18 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents, excluding soil carbon sinks (- 8%). Monte Carlo simulations indicated a coefficient of variation of 4.08%, while sensitivity analysis pinpointed nitrous oxides emissions post-compost application as the key influencing factor (+/- 14%) of the carbon footprint. Environmental sustainability of composting becomes apparent when compared to landfilling; each ton of biomass waste composted instead of landfilled reduces approximately 110 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents. The study concludes that composting is environmentally advantageous over landfilling, underscoring the need to include environmental burden of waste input biomass, particularly food waste, in compost carbon footprint evaluations.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
13423 Serafini, LF; Feliciano, M; Rodrigues, MA; Goncalves, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of LCA to Assess the Environmental Impacts of the Composting Process(2023)Sustainability, 15, 2
21974 Slorach, PC; Jeswani, HK; Cuéllar-Franca, R; Azapagic, A Energy demand and carbon footprint of treating household food waste compared to its prevention(2019)
21371 Keng, ZX; Chong, S; Ng, CG; Ridzuan, NI; Hanson, S; Pan, GT; Lau, PL; Supramaniam, CV; Singh, A; Chin, CF; Lam, HL Community-scale composting for food waste: A life-cycle assessment-supported case study(2020)
16565 Policastro, G; Cesaro, A Composting of Organic Solid Waste of Municipal Origin: The Role of Research in Enhancing Its Sustainability(2023)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 20, 1
28913 Slorach, PC; Jeswani, HK; Cuéllar-Franca, R; Azapagic, A Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy(2019)
8081 Sayara, T; Sanchez, A Gaseous Emissions from the Composting Process: Controlling Parameters and Strategies of Mitigation(2021)Processes, 9, 10
14949 Oviedo-Ocaña, ER; Abendroth, C; Domínguez, IC; Sánchez, A; Dornack, C Life cycle assessment of biowaste and green waste composting systems: A review of applications and implementation challenges(2023)
21922 Thomson, A; Price, GW; Arnold, P; Dixon, M; Graham, T Review of the potential for recycling CO2 from organic waste composting into plant production under controlled environment agriculture(2022)
23691 Lord, R; Sakrabani, R Ten-year legacy of organic carbon in non-agricultural (brownfield) soils restored using green waste compost exceeds 4 per mille per annum: Benefits and trade-offs of a circular economy approach(2019)
68212 Abu Qdais, H; Wuensch, C; Dornack, C; Nassour, A The role of solid waste composting in mitigating climate change in Jordan(2019)Waste Management & Research, 37, 8
Scroll