| Title | Residual biomass as resource - Life-cycle environmental impact of wastes in circular resource systems |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 21168 |
| Authors | Olofsson, J; Börjesson, P |
| Title | Residual biomass as resource - Life-cycle environmental impact of wastes in circular resource systems |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Within an envisioned circular bio-based economy, a key component is the valorization of biomass wastes and residues into valuable products. If the commonly used method of life-cycle assessment (LCA) is applied to such products, an update and adaptation of LCA practice is needed regarding potentially outdated assumptions of residual resources as free from environmental impact. This paper therefore presents and discusses LCA approaches to evaluating residual biomass as resources, and implications of different approaches to LCA results and decision-making. Based on an analysis of 31 LCA studies of bio-based products, and on a model for recycling in LCA, we discuss alternatives to zero-burden assumptions for biomass residues. The studied literature shows a variety of approaches to assessing the impacts of residues, including views of relevant characteristics and causality in primary production systems, and intended use and interpretation of LCA results. In general, acknowledging upstream impacts through a simple model of recycling and allocation entails that the environmental characteristics of primary production systems reflect on by-products and residues. We argue that LCA studies of residue valorization must recognize the potential value of residues by considering upstream impacts, and thereby avoid both misconceptions of residues as per default environmentally preferable resources, and unintentional support for high-impact primary production systems. Residues as resources require this adaptation in LCA practice in order to avoid misguided decisions for a low-impact, bio-based and circular economy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
17042
|
Oldfield, TL; White, E; Holden, NM The implications of stakeholder perspective for LCA of wasted food and green waste(2018) | |
| 28992
|
Sfez, S; De Meester, S; Vlaeminck, SE; Dewulf, J Improving the resource footprint evaluation of products recovered from wastewater: A discussion on appropriate allocation in the context of circular economy(2019) | |
| 28092
|
Rigamonti, L; Falbo, A; Zampori, L; Sala, S Supporting a transition towards sustainable circular economy: sensitivity analysis for the interpretation of LCA for the recovery of electric and electronic waste(2017)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 22.0, 8 | |
| 21647
|
Bishop, G; Styles, D; Lens, PNL Land-use change and valorisation of feedstock side-streams determine the climate mitigation potential of bioplastics(2022) | |
| 28975
|
Nordahl, SL; Scown, CD Recommendations for life-cycle assessment of recyclable plastics in a circular economy(2024)Chemical Science, 15.0, 25 | |
| 24387
|
Bassi, SA; Tonini, D; Ekvall, T; Astrup, TF A life cycle assessment framework for large-scale changes in material circularity(2021) | |
| 6882
|
Gonçalves, M; Freire, F; Garcia, R Material flow analysis of forest biomass in Portugal to support a circular bioeconomy(2021) | |
| 16653
|
Ingrao, C; Faccilongo, N; Di Gioia, L; Messineo, A Food waste recovery into energy in a circular economy perspective: A comprehensive review of aspects related to plant operation and environmental assessment(2018) | |
| 13181
|
Daigo, I Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Materials(2022)Tetsu To Hagane-Journal Of The Iron And Steel Institute Of Japan, 108, 11 | |
| 16212
|
Marcelino, S; Gaspar, PD; Paço, A Sustainable Waste Management in the Production of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants-A Systematic Review(2023)Sustainability, 15, 18 |