Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Identifying the most sustainable beer packaging through a Life Cycle Assessment
ID_Doc 21980
Authors Marrucci, L; Daddi, T; Iraldo, F
Title Identifying the most sustainable beer packaging through a Life Cycle Assessment
Year 2024
Published
Abstract The beer industry stands as a significant player in the global economy, and it is increasingly renowned not only for its diverse flavours, but also for its impact on the environment. Amidst its popularity, the beer sector faces mounting pressure to address environmental concerns, particularly related to packaging. As the world is increasingly embracing sustainability as a guiding principle, the beer industry's approach to packaging has come under scrutiny for its ecological footprint. This study aims to shed some light on the environmental footprint of beer production by applying a life cycle assessment, comparing different types of packaging. This study calculated the product environmental footprint of beer consumed in PET kegs, glass bottles and aluminium cans, and performed three sensitivity analyses on load factors of transport, waste transport distance and recycled content. The results identified draught beer in PET kegs as the most sustainable solution for beer consumption, with a footprint of around 90% lower than the other types of packaging. However, the analysis showed that the biggest environmental impact is found in the cultivation, packaging and use phases, that account for a contribution of 60 %, 27 % and 11 % respectively. The results of this study highlighted the importance of the load factor in the distribution phase, of recyclability and of the use of secondary raw materials for packaging. This study stands as an original and valuable contribution, offering a comprehensive understanding of the environmental impact of beer packaging and of the beverage industry. Its insights can guide breweries, policymakers, and consumers towards sustainable choices, fostering a positive change within the sector. It also questions the sustainability of circular solutions by comparing recycling and reuse options. This study revealed also that a green supply chain management is key in the transition towards a circular economy and in the decarbonization process.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174941

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
23190 Morgan, DR; Styles, D; Lane, ET Packaging choice and coordinated distribution logistics to reduce the environmental footprint of small-scale beer value chains(2022)
28115 Cimini, A; Moresi, M Circular economy in the brewing chain(2021)Italian Journal Of Food Science, 33.0, 3
5189 Ingrao, C; Wojnarowska, M Findings from a streamlined life cycle assessment of PET-bottles for beverage-packaging applications, in the context of circular economy(2023)
17945 Diniz, DD; Carvalho, M Environmental Repercussions of Craft Beer Production in Northeast Brazil(2024)Sustainability, 16, 11
22250 Mainardis, M; Hickey, M; Dereli, RK Lifting craft breweries sustainability through spent grain valorisation and renewable energy integration: A critical review in the circular economy framework(2024)
28218 Ciliz, NK; Kalipçioglu, C; Korkmaz, AP; Uzun, M; Degirmen, C; Barin, S Evaluation Of Glass And Pet Packaging Wastes Generated By Beverage Industry Within The Scope Of Environmental Sustainability(2022)
4003 Sazdovski, I; Bala, A; Fullana-i-Palmer, P Linking LCA literature with circular economy value creation: A review on beverage packaging(2021)
23537 Ferrara, C; Migliaro, V; Ventura, F; De Feo, G An economic and environmental analysis of wine packaging systems in Italy: A life cycle (LC) approach(2023)
12266 Cappiello, G; Aversa, C; Genovesi, A; Barletta, M Life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based packaging solutions for extended shelf-life (ESL) milk(2022)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29.0, 13
21778 Pauer, E; Wohner, B; Heinrich, V; Tacker, M Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment(2019)Sustainability, 11.0, 3
Scroll