Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title The circularity gap of nations: A multiregional analysis of waste generation, recovery, and stock depletion in 2011
ID_Doc 22096
Authors Aguilar-Hernandez, GA; Sigüenza-Sanchez, CP; Donati, F; Merciai, S; Schmidt, J; Rodrigues, JF; Tukker, A
Title The circularity gap of nations: A multiregional analysis of waste generation, recovery, and stock depletion in 2011
Year 2019
Published
Abstract Due to increased policy attention on circular economy strategies, many studies have quantified material use and recovery at national and global scales. However, there has been no quantitative analysis of the unrecovered waste that can be potentially reintegrated into the economy as materials or products. This can be interpreted as the gap of material circularity. In this paper we define the circularity gap of a country as the generated waste, plus old materials removed from stocks and durable products disposed (i.e. stock depletion), minus recovered waste. We estimated the circularity gap of 43 nations and 5 rest of the world regions in 2011, using the global, multiregional hybrid-units input-output database EXIOBASE v3.3. Our results show the trends of circularity gap in accordance to each region. For example, the circularity gaps of Europe and North America were between 1.6-2.2 tonnes per capita (t/cap), which are more than twice the global average gap (0.8 t/cap). Although these regions presented the major amount of material recovery, their circularity gaps were mostly related to the levels of stock depletion. In Africa and Asia-Pacific regions, the circularity gap was characterized by a low degree of recovery and stock depletion, with high levels of generated waste. Moreover, we discuss which intervention types can be implemented to minimize the circularity gap of nations.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104452

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
22460 Aguilar-Hernandez, GA; Deetman, S; Merciai, S; Rodrigues, JFD; Tukker, A Global distribution of material inflows to in-use stocks in 2011 and its implications for a circularity transition(2021)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 25.0, 6
22720 Towa, E; Zeller, V; Achten, WMJ Assessing the circularity of regions: Stakes of trade of waste for treatment(2021)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 25.0, 4
21808 Haas, W; Krausmann, F; Wiedenhofer, D; Heinz, M How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005(2015)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 19.0, 5
3568 Tisserant, A; Pauliuk, S; Merciai, S; Schmidt, J; Fry, J; Wood, R; Tukker, A Solid Waste and the Circular Economy A Global Analysis of Waste Treatment and Waste Footprints(2017)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21, 3
3511 Mayer, A; Haas, W; Wiedenhofer, D; Krausmann, F; Nuss, P; Blengini, GA Measuring Progress towards a Circular Economy: A Monitoring Framework for Economy-wide Material Loop Closing in the EU28(2019)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 23, 1
16912 Haas, W; Krausmann, F; Wiedenhofer, D; Heinz, M How Circular Is the Global Economy? A Sociometabolic Analysis(2016)
20396 Ha, L What are the impacts of economic complexity and product proximity on nations' circularity? An empirical approach using statistical analysis(2023)
4239 Wiebe, KS; Harsdorff, M; Montt, G; Simas, MS; Wood, R Global Circular Economy Scenario in a Multiregional Input-Output Framework(2019)Environmental Science & Technology, 53, 11
1579 Chen, CC; Pao, HT Circular economy and ecological footprint: A disaggregated analysis for the EU(2024)
4387 Giannakitsidou, O; Giannikos, I; Chondrou, A Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: A DEA application in MSW(2020)
Scroll