| Title | Recycling portable alkaline/ZnC batteries for a circular economy: An assessment of natural resource consumption from a life cycle and criticality perspective |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 22629 |
| Authors | Tran, HP; Schaubroeck, T; Swart, P; Six, L; Coonen, P; Dewulf, J |
| Title | Recycling portable alkaline/ZnC batteries for a circular economy: An assessment of natural resource consumption from a life cycle and criticality perspective |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | It has been recognized that a proper and sustainable management strategy might help prevent the risks of leaching from waste portable batteries (WPBs), which are an important waste stream, and aid the conservation of raw materials. Unlike existing studies on WPB management, which focus mainly on emissions, this case study uses a resource-oriented approach to thoroughly analyze the performance of a WPB collection and recycling scheme. This study focused on the WPB take-back and recycling system managed by Bebat in Belgium. Life cycle assessment was conducted using three different existing life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods representing three different perspectives: Cumulative Exergy Extracted from the Natural Environment; Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP), split into impact categories called ADP(elements) and ADP(fossiiffiebi) and damage to Resource Cost. A new LCIA method, the criticality-based impact assessment method, has also been introduced to cover the socioeconomic aspects of natural resource consumption. The performance of the mixed waste (i.e., batteries, flashlights) collection and sorting system was assessed from 2011 to 2013. This analysis showed that in 2012, the use of collection receptacles made of plastic bags with 30% recycled content, instead of non-recycled paper or cardboard with 30% recycled content, was one of the main reasons for the low impact of the whole system from all assessment perspectives. The performance of entire take-back and recycling system for alkaline and zinc-carbon (ZnC) batteries, the two most popular portable batteries, was subsequently analyzed and benchmarked against two incineration scenarios: with and without bottom ash recovery. The comparisons of the four LCIA methods show differing results. The most prominent result is that the ADP(etements) score of the recycling scenario is 7-9 times lower than that of the incineration scenario, mainly due to metals (i.e., iron and zinc) savings via recycling. The recycling system requires 17-52% less material criticality, but extracts 13-18% more exergy from the natural environment and has a higher ADP(fossiifuels), score (about 14-16%) than the incineration system. These comparisons indicate that although the alkaline/ZnC battery management system run by Bebat does not reduce consumption of all resources, especially fossil fuels and land, it is beneficial in terms of minerals and metals savings. To further improve the efficiency and environmental performance of the collection system, different measures were implemented. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impacts of those measures on the mixed waste collection and sorting system and the alkaline/ZnC battery take-back and recycling system. The results suggested that a combination of different measures, especially reducing the number of receptacles used and enhancing their environmental performance, can considerably reduce the resource footprint. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
15154
|
Luo, XL; Ding, N; Yang, JX; Lu, B; Ma, J Potential environmental benefits assessment of recycling based on multi-LCA and SFA(2024) | |
| 25556
|
Castro, FD; Mehner, E; Cutaia, L; Vaccari, M Life cycle assessment of an innovative lithium-ion battery recycling route: A feasibility study(2022) | |
| 6650
|
Ducoli, S; Fahimi, A; Mousa, E; Ye, GZ; Federici, S; Frontera, P; Bontempi, E ESCAPE approach for the sustainability evaluation of spent lithium-ion batteries recovery: Dataset of 33 available technologies(2022) | |
| 13262
|
Mählitz, PM; Korf, N; Chryssos, G; Rotter, VS Contributions of extended batch tests for assessing technical recyclability: A case study of low-value battery flows(2022)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 26, 3 | |
| 22876
|
Iturrondobeitia, M; Vallejo, C; Berroci, M; Akizu-Gardoki, O; Minguez, R; Lizundia, E Environmental Impact Assessment of LiNi1/3M1/3C1/3O2 Hydrometallurgical Cathode Recycling from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries(2022)Acs Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 10.0, 30 | |
| 21614
|
Sommerville, R; Zhu, PC; Rajaeifar, MA; Heidrich, O; Goodship, V; Kendrick, E A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes(2021) | |
| 27341
|
Díaz-Ramírez, MC; Ferreira, VJ; García-Armingol, T; López-Sabirón, AM; Ferreira, G Battery Manufacturing Resource Assessment to Minimise Component Production Environmental Impacts(2020)Sustainability, 12.0, 17 | |
| 22885
|
Fahimi, A; Ducoli, S; Federici, S; Ye, GZ; Mousa, E; Frontera, P; Bontempi, E Evaluation of the sustainability of technologies to recycle spent lithium-ion batteries, based on embodied energy and carbon footprint(2022) | |
| 9783
|
Klejnowska, K; Sydow, M; Michalski, R; Bogacka, M Life Cycle Impacts of Recycling of Black Mass Obtained from End-of-Life Zn-C and Alkaline Batteries Using Waelz Kiln(2023)Energies, 16.0, 1 | |
| 15183
|
Bobba, S; Mathieux, F; Ardente, F; Blengini, GA; Cusenza, MA; Podias, A; Pfrang, A Life Cycle Assessment of repurposed electric vehicle batteries: an adapted method based on modelling energy flows(2018) |