| Title | Identifying and Evaluating Recirculation Strategies for Industry in the Nordic Countries |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 22997 |
| Authors | Hildenbrand, J; Dahlström, J; Shahbazi, S; Kurdve, M |
| Title | Identifying and Evaluating Recirculation Strategies for Industry in the Nordic Countries |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Recycling, 6.0, 4 |
| Abstract | The manufacturing industry in the Nordic countries aims to include closing product and material loops to recover values in their circular economy strategies. Recirculating strategies for products and materials are required for existing products that are part of the stock and are also anticipated to be aligned with products designed for circularity and circular business models in the future. Options to capture value of discarded products are diverse and include reuse, remanufacturing and material recycling. The Circular Economy Integration in the Nordic Industry for enhanced sustainability and competitiveness (CIRCit) project developed a framework to guide decision makers in the industry on how to identify suitable treatments and subsequent use at the end of use or end of life of a product and how to select among different options. Factors considered in the assessment include technical feasibility, necessary efforts, networks of business partners, legal implications and overall sustainability aspects. Our empirical studies show great support for decision-makers in the value recovery of different products with different complexity levels. It is also concluded that the properties of products at their end of use are the main drivers behind selecting a proper recirculation strategy. This study contributes with an empirical evaluation and a consistent terminology framework for recirculation options. The general setup is relevant for the Nordic countries. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/6/4/74/pdf?version=1636710361 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
27499
|
Ferraro, S; Baffa, F; Cantini, A; Leoni, L; De Carlo, F; Campatelli, G Exploring remanufacturing conveniency: An economic and energetic assessment for a closed-loop supply chain of a mechanical component(2024) | |
| 17078
|
Shahbazi, S; Jönbrink, AK Design Guidelines to Develop Circular Products: Action Research on Nordic Industry(2020)Sustainability, 12, 9 | |
| 1358
|
Singh, J; Ordoñez, I Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy(2016) | |
| 20127
|
Skärin, F; Rösiö, C; Andersen, AL Circularity Practices in Manufacturing-A Study of the 20 Largest Manufacturing Companies in Sweden(2022) | |
| 4023
|
Megevand, B; Cao, WJ; Di Maio, F; Rem, P Circularity in Practice: Review of Main Current Approaches and Strategic Propositions for an Efficient Circular Economy of Materials(2022)Sustainability, 14, 2 | |
| 28587
|
Nag, U; Sharma, SK; Kumar, V Multiple Life-Cycle Products: A Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, Challenges, and Benefits in a Circular Economy(2022)Journal Of Engineering Design, 33.0, 3 | |
| 3816
|
Milios, L Overarching policy framework for product life extension in a circular economy-A bottom-up business perspective(2021)Environmental Policy And Governance, 31, 4 | |
| 27204
|
Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J; Sundin, E; Sakao, T Orienting around circular strategies (Rs): How to reach the longest and highest ride on the Retained Value Hill?(2023) | |
| 693
|
Tam, E; Soulliere, K; Sawyer-Beaulieu, S Managing complex products to support the circular economy(2019) | |
| 863
|
Reike, D; Vermeulen, WJV; Witjes, S The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? - Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options(2018) |