| Title | Design for adaptability and disassembly: guidelines for building deconstruction |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 23027 |
| Authors | Munaro, MR; Tavares, SF |
| Title | Design for adaptability and disassembly: guidelines for building deconstruction |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Purpose Design for adaptability and disassembly (DfAD) is an effective method to reduce construction and demolition waste generation, landfill loads and greenhouse gas generation; preserve natural resources; and increase environmental awareness in the construction industry. However, it is an underexplored strategy due to a lack of information about projects and a set of agreed guidelines to guide buildings deconstruction. This study aims to understand how DfAD can support the sector's transition toward circularity.Design/methodology/approach Through an integrative literature review, this study analyzed the current publications and terminologies used, identified the main themes discussed and described the key criteria for integrating deconstruction in the building design stage.Findings The results showed that the term DfAD encompasses different ecodesign strategies and is concentrated in six major thematic categories (design and construction principles, tools for DfAD, components and connections for DfAD, barriers, drivers and guidelines for DfAD, existing building stock potential and selective deconstruction process). In total, 60 criteria were presented to guide the deconstruction of buildings, emphasizing standardization, modularization and prefabrication of materials and components as fundamental requirements.Originality/value The study highlighted the need to expand the knowledge and training of the design team, establish public policies and tax incentives and develop tools, methods, and circular indicators to enable the implementation of deconstruction strategies for buildings. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
16973
|
Munaro, MR; Tavares, SF; Bragança, L The ecodesign methodologies to achieve buildings' deconstruction: A review and framework(2022) | |
| 25640
|
Balogun, H; Alaka, H; Egwim, CN; Ajayi, S Systematic review of drivers influencing building deconstructability: Towards a construct-based conceptual framework(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41, 3 | |
| 16364
|
Motahar, MM; Nourzad, SH; Rahimi, F Integrating complete disassembly planning with deconstructability assessment to facilitate designing deconstructable buildings(2024)Architectural Engineering And Design Management, 20, 1 | |
| 10358
|
Cruz-Rios, F; Grau, D Design for Disassembly: An Analysis of the Practice (or Lack Thereof) in the United States(2020) | |
| 3090
|
de Lima, PRB; Rodrigues, CD; Post, JM Integration of BIM and design for deconstruction to improve circular economy of buildings(2023) | |
| 28664
|
Bertino, G; Kisser, J; Zeilinger, J; Langergraber, G; Fischer, T; Österreicher, D Fundamentals of Building Deconstruction as a Circular Economy Strategy for the Reuse of Construction Materials(2021)Applied Sciences-Basel, 11.0, 3 | |
| 28478
|
Pristerà, G; Tonini, D; Tornaghi, ML; Caro, D; Sala, S Taxonomy of design for deconstruction options to enable circular economy in buildings(2024) | |
| 19518
|
Allam, AS; Nik-Bakht, M From demolition to deconstruction of the built environment: A synthesis of the literature(2023) | |
| 23767
|
Roxas, CLC; Bautista, CR; Dela Cruz, OG; Dela Cruz, RLC; De Pedro, JPQ; Dungca, JR; Lejano, BA; Ongpeng, JMC Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) and Design for Deconstruction (DfD) in the Construction Industry: Challenges, Trends and Developments(2023)Buildings, 13, 5 | |
| 17799
|
Balogun, H; Alaka, H; Ajayi, S; Egwim, CN Critical factors for assessing building deconstructability: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis(2024) |