| Title | Potential of BREEAM-C to support building circularity assessment: Insights from case study and expert interview |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 23100 |
| Authors | Wong, DH; Zhang, CB; Di Maio, F; Hu, MM |
| Title | Potential of BREEAM-C to support building circularity assessment: Insights from case study and expert interview |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Lack of knowledge and tools hampers circular transition in the construction industry. This study analyzes the potential of a framework of circular indicators put forward by the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM-C) as an answer to the prevailing need of a metric for building circularity assessment to promote circular construction. A qualitative analysis approach is adopted, involving literature review, comparative case study and semi-structured interviews conducted for collecting expert opinions. An indepth scrutiny of the BREEAM-C indicators revealed that they are rooted in circular principles, cover building circularity realizable through circular strategies, and have given due consideration to circularity in different impact areas, structural layers and life-cycle stages of buildings. Moreover, BREEAM-C indicators not only show capacity in identifying CE-related practices implemented, but also serve as benchmarks testifying that CE principles/strategies are incorporated in the design, construction, operation and management of the buildings. Despite having room for expansion, BREEAM-C has proven to be applicable and practical with potential for use in Taiwan as confirmed by expert opinions. Nevertheless, adaptation/localization is required to cater for different concerns with respect to climate and safety as well as local context and legislations. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140836 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
27896
|
Khadim, N; Agliata, R; Marino, A; Thaheem, MJ; Mollo, L Critical review of nano and micro-level building circularity indicators and frameworks(2022) | |
| 4646
|
Khadim, N; Agliata, R; Thaheem, MJ; Mollo, L Whole building circularity indicator: A circular economy assessment framework for promoting circularity and sustainability in buildings and construction(2023) | |
| 22447
|
Segara, S; Li, Q; Gallotta, A; Wang, YL; Gosling, J; Rezgui, Y Taxonomy of circularity indicators for the built environment: Integrating circularity through the Royal Institute of British architects (RIBA) plan of work(2024) | |
| 22366
|
Antwi-Afari, P; Ng, ST; Chen, J Developing an integrative method and design guidelines for achieving systemic circularity in the construction industry(2022) | |
| 22289
|
Talpur, BD; Liuzzi, S; Rubino, C; Cannavale, A; Martellotta, F Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Building Design in South Asian Countries: A Review of the Current State of the Art and Research Potentials(2023)Buildings, 13.0, 12 | |
| 3129
|
Fagone, C; Santamicone, M; Villa, V Architecture Engineering and Construction Industrial Framework for Circular Economy: Development of a Circular Construction Site Methodology(2023)Sustainability, 15, 3 | |
| 22199
|
Askar, R; Braganca, L; Gervasio, H Design for Adaptability (DfA)-Frameworks and Assessment Models for Enhanced Circularity in Buildings(2022)Applied System Innovation, 5.0, 1 | |
| 2828
|
Munaro, MR; Tavares, SF; Bragança, L Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment(2020) | |
| 1775
|
Abadi, M; Moore, DR; Sammuneh, MA A framework of indicators to measure project circularity in construction circular economy(2021) | |
| 22403
|
Abadi, M; Moore, DR Selection of Circular Proposals in Building Projects: An MCDM Model for Lifecycle Circularity Assessments Using AHP(2022)Buildings, 12.0, 8 |