| Title | Landfill reduction experience in The Netherlands |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 23327 |
| Authors | Scharff, H |
| Title | Landfill reduction experience in The Netherlands |
| Year | 2014 |
| Published | Waste Management, 34, 11 |
| Abstract | Modern waste legislation aims at resource efficiency and landfill reduction. This paper analyses more than 20 years of landfill reduction in the Netherlands. The combination of landfill regulations, landfill tax and landfill bans resulted in the desired landfill reduction, but also had negative effects. A fierce competition developed over the remaining waste to be landfilled. In 2013 the Dutch landfill industry generated 40 million of annual revenue, had E58 million annual costs and therefore incurred an annual loss of 18 million. It is not an attractive option to prematurely end business. There is a risk that Dutch landfill operators will not be able to fulfil the financial obligations for closure and aftercare. Contrary to the polluter pays principle the burden may end up with society. EU regulations prohibiting export of waste for disposal are in place. Strong differentials in landfill tax rate between nations have nevertheless resulted in transboundary shipment of waste and in non-compliance with the self-sufficiency and proximity principles. During the transformation from a disposal society to a recycling society, it is important to carefully plan required capacity and to guide the reorganisation of the landfill sector. At some point, it is no longer profitable to provide landfill services. It may be necessary for public organisations or the state to take responsibility for the continued operation of a 'safety net' in waste management. Regulations have created a financial incentive to pass on the burden of monitoring and controlling the impact of waste to future generations. To prevent this, it is necessary to revise regulations on aftercare and create incentives to actively stabilise landfills. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
13664
|
Brand, E; de Nijs, TCM; Dijkstra, JJ; Comans, RNJ A novel approach in calculating site-specific aftercare completion criteria for landfills in The Netherlands: Policy developments(2016) | |
| 14026
|
Hoogmartens, R; Eyckmans, J; Van Passel, S Landfill taxes and Enhanced Waste Management: Combining valuable practices with respect to future waste streams(2016) | |
| 11025
|
Di Maria, A; Eyckmans, J; Van Acker, K Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making(2018) | |
| 9370
|
Grossule, V; Stegmann, R Problems In Traditional Landfilling And Proposals For Solutions Based On Sustainability(2020) | |
| 14860
|
Vaverková, MD Landfill Impacts on the Environment-Review(2019)Geosciences, 9, 10 | |
| 15513
|
Farmer, TD; Shaw, P; Williams, ID Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013(2015) | |
| 22701
|
Taus, P; Simková, Z; Cehlár, M; Krajnáková, I; Drozda, J Fulfillment of EU Goals in the Field of Waste Management through Energy Recovery from Waste(2023)Energies, 16.0, 4 | |
| 13411
|
Towa, E; Zeller, V; Merciai, S; Achten, WMJ Regional waste footprint and waste treatments analysis(2021) | |
| 12686
|
Godfrey, L; Oelofse, S Historical Review of Waste Management and Recycling in South Africa(2017)Resources-Basel, 6.0, 4 | |
| 14455
|
Sauve, G; Van Acker, K The environmental impacts of municipal solid waste landfills in Europe: A life cycle assessment of proper reference cases to support decision making(2020) |