| Title | The hierarchy of resource use for a sustainable circular economy |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 2362 |
| Authors | Nilsen, HR |
| Title | The hierarchy of resource use for a sustainable circular economy |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | International Journal Of Social Economics, 47, 1 |
| Abstract | Purpose The original principles of the hierarchy of resource use seem to have been forgotten. The purpose of this paper is to address the necessity of these principles in order for a circular economy (CE) to be sustainable. Design/methodology/approach This is a general review paper explaining today's shortcomings in a CE and in the waste hierarchy. Its theoretical contribution is illustrated using the example of marine plastic waste in the Arctic, as well as the EU's action plan for a CE: "Closing the loop". Findings There is a need to reduce raw materials into the economy directly and not only as a potential result of recycling. This is supported theoretically and by illustrating that the EU's action plan is closing the loop primarily from the output side. Research limitations/implications - The theoretical possibility of complete recycling rests on a premise that is now at odds with a sustainable development. Social implications - The power of existing raw material production cycles must be challenged to allow reduction to be a real option. If not, a CE may exacerbate a moral trade-off by the current generation reducing the safe operating space of future living beings. Originality/value The theoretical possibility of recycling everything, also known as the technology-optimist view, has played the role of a safety net for humanity. As we are now exceeding planetary boundaries for a safe and just space for humanity, this theoretical safety net is no longer valid. Instead, we must reinforce the basic principles of the hierarchy of resource use. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
28596
|
He, PJ; Lü, F; Zhang, H; Shao, LM Recent Developments in the Area of Waste as a Resource, with Particular Reference to the Circular Economy as a Guiding Principle(2013) | |
| 21808
|
Haas, W; Krausmann, F; Wiedenhofer, D; Heinz, M How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005(2015)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 19.0, 5 | |
| 5593
|
Schüpfer, D; Wagner-Wenz, R; Hendrich, K; Weidenkaff, A Materials come around and go around: Adapting to nature's circularity(2023)Mrs Bulletin, 48, 11 | |
| 210
|
Paraschiv, GI; Hubel, SR; Dumitrache, AM Transition To A Circular Economy - Strategies And Progress(2020) | |
| 971
|
Van Caneghem, J; Van Acker, K; De Greef, J; Wauters, G; Vandecasteele, C Waste-to-energy is compatible and complementary with recycling in the circular economy(2019)Clean Technologies And Environmental Policy, 21, 5 | |
| 4892
|
Hill, JE The circular economy: from waste to resource stewardship, part I(2015)Proceedings Of The Institution Of Civil Engineers-Waste And Resource Management, 168, 1 | |
| 2144
|
Desing, H; Brunner, D; Takacs, F; Nahrath, S; Frankenberger, K; Hischier, R A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource based, systemic approach(2020) | |
| 20229
|
Birat, JP Life-cycle assessment, resource efficiency and recycling(2015)Metallurgical Research & Technology, 112, 2 | |
| 1195
|
Lingaitiene, O; Burinskiene, A; Gruzauskas, V Review Of Challenges To Transition Towards Circular Economy(2024)Entrepreneurship And Sustainability Issues, 11, 3 | |
| 5049
|
Skene, KR Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work(2018)Sustainability Science, 13, 2 |