| Title | Attributional and consequential life cycle perspectives of second-generation polylactic acid: The benefits of integrating a recycling strategy |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 24016 |
| Authors | Rebolledo-Leiva, R; Ladakis, D; Ioannidou, SM; Koutinas, A; Moreira, MT; González-García, S |
| Title | Attributional and consequential life cycle perspectives of second-generation polylactic acid: The benefits of integrating a recycling strategy |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The climate crisis calls for a shift from petrochemicals to bio-based products to reduce environmental consequences. Polylactic acid (PLA) is one of the most widely used biopolymers, due to its mechanical properties and renewable origin, to produce bio-based compostable plastic for food packaging. The objective of this study is to determine the environmental feasibility of a second-generation PLA production based on wheat straw; and the role of a chemical recycling plant on the environmental performance of a bioproduct at an early design stage. A holistic assessment was performed through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology considering both attributional and consequential perspectives, through a cradle-to-grave approach. The attributional LCA results show that lactic acid production was the main contributor due to the wheat straw pre-treatment and downstream separation and purification (DSP) processes. The integration of a recycling plant leads to a significant reduction of burdens, ranging from 1.38 to 0.44 kg CO2eq in the Global Warming category. Furthermore, consequential LCA results shows that the increased demand for substitute products for activities such as feeding, fertilisation and energy generation and the indirect emissions from land use change related to the conversion of land for the cultivation of raw materials are relevant factors in the environmental effects associated with the possible implementation of straw-based bioPLA production system. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138354 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
23177
|
Fonseca, A; Ramalho, E; Gouveia, A; Figueiredo, F; Nunes, J Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review(2023)Sustainability, 15, 16 | |
| 23634
|
Synani, K; Abeliotis, K; Velonia, K; Maragkaki, A; Manios, T; Lasaridi, K Environmental Impact and Sustainability of Bioplastic Production from Food Waste(2024)Sustainability, 16, 13 | |
| 27472
|
Kawashima, N; Yagi, T; Kojima, K Pilot-Scale Composting Test of Polylactic Acid for Social Implementation(2021)Sustainability, 13.0, 4 | |
| 6153
|
Bishop, G; Styles, D; Lens, PNL Environmental performance of bioplastic packaging on fresh food produce: A consequential life cycle assessment(2021) | |
| 6147
|
Schwarz, A; Ferjana, S; Kunst, J Life cycle assessment of advanced grade PLA product with novel end-of-life treatment through depolymerization(2023) | |
| 4783
|
Shogren, R; Wood, D; Orts, W; Glenn, G Plant-based materials and transitioning to a circular economy(2019) | |
| 21647
|
Bishop, G; Styles, D; Lens, PNL Land-use change and valorisation of feedstock side-streams determine the climate mitigation potential of bioplastics(2022) | |
| 25597
|
Bala, A; Arfelis, S; Oliver-Ortega, H; Méndez, JA Life cycle assessment of PE and PP multi film compared with PLA and PLA reinforced with nanoclays film(2022) | |
| 16507
|
Michaliszyn-Gabrys, B; Krupanek, J; Kalisz, M; Smith, J Challenges for Sustainability in Packaging of Fresh Vegetables in Organic Farming(2022)Sustainability, 14, 9 | |
| 25790
|
Atabay, D; Rosentrater, KA; Ghnimi, S The sustainability debate on plastics: Cradle to grave Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economical Analysis of PP and PLA polymers with a "Polluter Pays Principle" perspective(2022) |