| Title | Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 24512 |
| Authors | Santos, E; Fonseca, F; Santiago, A; Rodrigues, D |
| Title | Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Sustainability, 16, 5 |
| Abstract | Municipal solid waste is a chronic problem in many developing countries like Brazil. Addressing the challenges of waste management requires robust frameworks for assessing the policies' impacts. In this context, sustainability indicators may help decision-makers in adopting more efficient waste policies. The main goal of this study is to propose a framework for identifying and classifying indicators related to waste management within Brazilian public policies. This evaluation was based on extensive legislative surveys aimed at identifying goals, targets, and obligations outlined in these policies. A comprehensive Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework was employed to identify and classify the usefulness of these indicators in the context of waste management. A total of 151 indicators were identified, alongside 283 waste goals, targets, and obligations, which were primarily related to municipal waste and were mostly sourced from plans, laws, presidential decrees, and collegiate resolutions. Within the framework, 66 indicators, mostly related to waste collection and recycling, were deemed useful, comprising 34 classified as Responses, 14 as Pressures, six as Driving Forces, four as States, two as Impacts, and six as Pressure/Responses. The challenges associated with the DPSIR framework and strategies to enhance the efficiency of public waste policies in Brazil are also discussed. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
29870
|
Deus, RM; Esguícero, FJ; Battistelle, RAG; Jugend, D Drivers and barriers to successful solid waste management: assessing through an aggregated indicator(2022)Journal Of Material Cycles And Waste Management, 24.0, 4 | |
| 3095
|
Rebehy, PCPW; Salgado, AP; Ometto, AR; Espinoza, DD; Rossi, E; Novi, JC Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in Brazil: Drivers and best practices towards to circular economy based on European Union and BSI(2023) | |
| 21143
|
Moraes, FTF; Goncalves, ATT; Lima, JP; Lima, RD Transitioning towards a sustainable circular city: How to evaluate and improve urban solid waste management in Brazil(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41.0, 5 | |
| 13517
|
Junqueira, HS; Medeiros, DL; Cohim, E Management of solid urban waste in Feira de Santana: energy demand and carbon footprint(2022)Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental, 27, 1 | |
| 22356
|
Ferronato, N; Moresco, L; Lizarazu, GEG; Portillo, MAG; Conti, F; Torretta, V Comparison of environmental impacts related to municipal solid waste and construction and demolition waste management and recycling in a Latin American developing city(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30.0, 4 | |
| 18331
|
Franceschi, FF; Vega, LT; Sanches-Pereira, A; Cherni, JA; Gómez, MF A combined approach to improve municipal solid waste management in upper-middle-income countries: the case of Sabana Centro, Colombia(2022)Clean Technologies And Environmental Policy, 24.0, 8 | |
| 18769
|
Azevedo, BD; Scavarda, LF; Caiado, RGG; Fuss, M Improving urban household solid waste management in developing countries based on the German experience(2021) | |
| 74565
|
Rebehy, PCPW; Costa, AL; Campello, CAGB; Espinoza, DDF; Neto, MJ Innovative social business of selective waste collection in Brazil: Cleaner productionand poverty reduction(2017) | |
| 27679
|
Esguícero, FJ; Deus, RM; Battistelle, R; Martins, BL; Bezerra, BS Construction and demolition waste management process modeling: a framework for the Brazilian context(2021)Journal Of Material Cycles And Waste Management, 23.0, 5 | |
| 22359
|
de Andrade, MAU; Zanghelini, GM; Soares, SR Using life cycle assessment to address stakeholders' potential for improving municipal solid waste management(2017)Waste Management & Research, 35.0, 5 |