| Title | Bio-Based Polyisoprene Can Mitigate Climate Change and Deforestation in Expanding Rubber Production |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 24545 |
| Authors | Batten, R; Karanjikar, M; Spatari, S |
| Title | Bio-Based Polyisoprene Can Mitigate Climate Change and Deforestation in Expanding Rubber Production |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Fermentation-Basel, 7, 4 |
| Abstract | Biomass is a promising renewable feedstock to produce polyisoprene for the rubber industry. Through metabolic engineering, sugars derived from pretreated and hydrolyzed cellulose and hemicellulose can be directly fermented to isoprene to produce rubber. Here we investigate the life cycle environmental impact of isoprene fermentation to produce bio-polyisoprene from agricultural residues (of Zea mays L.). Results show that the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of bio-polyisoprene (-4.59 kg CO(2)e kg(-1)) is significantly lower than that of natural rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and synthetic rubber (-0.79 and 2.41 kg CO(2)e kg(-1), respectively), while supporting a circular biogenic carbon economy. We found the land use intensity of bio-polyisoprene to be 0.25 ha metric ton(-1), which is 84% lower than that from rubber tree plantations. We compare the direct fermentation to isoprene results with indirect fermentation to isoprene through the intermediate, methyl butyl ether, where dehydration to isoprene is required. The direct fermentation of isoprene reduces reaction steps and unit operations, an expected outcome when employing process intensification, but our results show additional energy conservation and reduced contribution to climate change. Among the ReCiPe life cycle environmental impact metrics evaluated, air emission related impacts are high for bio-polyisoprene compared to those for natural and synthetic rubber. Those impacts can be reduced with air emission controls during production. All other metrics showed an improvement for bio-polyisoprene compared to natural and synthetic rubber. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/7/4/204/pdf?version=1632408657 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
9532
|
Durkin, A; Taptygin, I; Kong, QY; Resul, MFMG; Rehman, A; Fernández, AML; Haryey, AP; Shah, N; Guo, M Scale-up and Sustainability Evaluation of Biopolymer Production from Citrus Waste Offering Carbon Capture and Utilisation Pathway(2019)Chemistryopen, 8.0, 6 | |
| 13508
|
Bourtsalas, AC Energy recovery and GHG impact assessment of biomass, polymers, and coal(2023) | |
| 10471
|
Zanon-Zotin, M; Bergman-Fonte, C; Morais, TN; Maia, PLB; Carvalho, L; Angelkorte, G; Fiorini, ACO; Rochedo, PRR; Portugal-Pereira, J; Szklo, A; Schaeffer, R Unpacking bio-based alternatives to ethylene production in Brazil, Europe, and the United States: A comparative life cycle assessment(2023) |