Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title From Waste to Resource: Compositional Analysis of Olive Cake's Fatty Acids, Nutrients and Antinutrients
ID_Doc 25544
Authors Paié-Ribeiro, J; Baptista, F; Teixeira, J; Guedes, C; Gomes, MJ; Teixeira, A; Barros, AN; Pinheiro, V; Outor-Monteiro, D
Title From Waste to Resource: Compositional Analysis of Olive Cake's Fatty Acids, Nutrients and Antinutrients
Year 2024
Published Applied Sciences-Basel, 14, 13
Abstract The olive oil industry, recognised for its beneficial products for health and food culture, generates a significant amount of by-products that, if not appropriately managed, can pose considerable environmental challenges. This study examined six olive cakes (OC) from the Tr & aacute;s-os-Montes and Alto Douro regions, collected on different dates and mills: two obtained by pressing (COC), two by centrifugation (TPOC), including one partially pitted and one dehydrated, and two exhausted (EOC), which were subjected to conventional chemical analyses, namely dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude fat (CF), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL) profiling fatty acid (FA) and phosphorus and phytic acid content. The dehydrated TPOC had only 8% moisture content (due to drying), followed by EOC with 10% and COC (65-79%). The CF content was high in COC 1 (14.5% in DM), residual in EOC (1.5%) and intermediate in TPOC (9-10%). CP ranged from 5.3 to 7.3%. Notably, NDF levels were high (>65% in 5 samples; pitted TPOC 57.4%) and very lignified (ADL > 23%). Different FA profiles were observed: COC had the highest monounsaturated (76.36 g/100 g), while EOC had the highest saturated (16.56 g/100 g) and polyunsaturated (14.14 g/100 g). Phosphorus and phytic acid content (g/100 g) of EOC 2, TPOC pitted, TPOC dehydrated, COC 1 and COC 2 showed similar values to each other (mean of 0.12 +/- 0.02 and 0.44 +/- 0.0, respectively), with EOC 1 having the lowest levels (0.07 +/- 0.01 and 0.26 +/- 0.04, respectively). These results highlight the potential of OCs, especially dry TPOC, which offers transport, conservation and utilisation benefits.
PDF https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135586

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
22736 Caparra, P; Chies, L; Scerra, M; Foti, F; Bognanno, M; Cilione, C; De Caria, P; Claps, S; Cifuni, GF Effect of Dietary Ensiled Olive Cake Supplementation on Performance and Meat Quality of Apulo-Calabrese Pigs(2023)Animals, 13.0, 12
15724 López-Salas, L; Díaz-Moreno, J; Ciulu, M; Borrás-Linares, I; Quirantes-Piné, R; Lozano-Sánchez, J Monitoring the Phenolic and Terpenic Profile of Olives, Olive Oils and By-Products throughout the Production Process(2024)Foods, 13, 10
14249 Rodrigues, N; Oliveira, C; Casal, S; Pereira, JA; Ramalhosa, E Table Olive Flours: An Ingredient Rich in Bioactive Compounds?(2022)Applied Sciences-Basel, 12, 3
7616 Ferreira, DM; Machado, S; Santo, LE; Costa, ASG; Ranga, F; Chis, MS; Palmeira, JD; Oliveira, MBPP; Alves, RC; Ferreira, H Changes in the Composition of Olive Pomace after Fermentation: A Preliminary Study(2024)Fermentation-Basel, 10, 6
13540 Nunes, MA; Páscoa, RNMJ; Alves, RC; Costa, ASG; Bessada, S; Oliveira, MBPP Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy as a tool to discriminate olive wastes: The case of monocultivar pomaces(2020)
27502 Fontana, C; Socciarelli, S; Aromolo, R; Pizzichini, D; Bellincampi, D; Benedetti, A; Neri, U Use Of Bioassays For Evaluation Of Pate Olive Cake (Poc) Effects In Agronomic Applications(2022)Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 31.0, 8A
14644 Otero, P; Garcia-Oliveira, P; Carpena, M; Barral-Martinez, M; Chamorro, F; Echave, J; Garcia-Perez, P; Cao, H; Xiao, JB; Simal-Gandara, J; Prieto, MA Applications of by-products from the olive oil processing: Revalorization strategies based on target molecules and green extraction technologies(2021)
29996 Khwaldia, K; Attour, N; Matthes, J; Beck, L; Schmid, M Olive byproducts and their bioactive compounds as a valuable source for food packaging applications(2022)Comprehensive Reviews In Food Science And Food Safety, 21.0, 2
Scroll