| Title | A circular construction evaluation framework to promote designing for disassembly and adaptability |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 25585 |
| Authors | Dams, B; Maskell, D; Shea, A; Allen, S; Driesser, M; Kretschmann, T; Walker, P; Emmitt, S |
| Title | A circular construction evaluation framework to promote designing for disassembly and adaptability |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | This paper formulates a concise, free-to-use Circular Construction Evaluation Framework (CCEF) based upon international design code guidelines to assess and quantify the circularity credentials of an existing or proposed construction project. Central to the principles of circular construction is designing for disassembly and adaptability - the ability of a building's elements and connecting components to be disassembled and reused, or rearranged, after the initial design life. Analysis of modern methods of construction and the compatibility of systems with the concepts of designing for disassembly and material reuse inform the development of the CCEF. Circular construction is facilitated by simplicity, standardisation and modularity in design, sustainably-sourced materials, transparent and accessible mechanical connections and the adoption of a manufacturing-style approach towards durable and reusable standardised components and materials. The CCEF allows users such as clients, consultants, contractors, local and national planning and infrastructure policy professionals to evaluate both whole building and elemental levels at the early design and planning stages in a new-build, refurbishment or renovation project. Implementation of a scoring system is demonstrated by the evaluation of example buildings with varying usage of conventional and bio-based materials. It is shown by use of the framework that a simple standardised construction using reversible connections and previously used material elements rates highly, demonstrating a greater extent of circularity in the construction. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
4538
|
Kret-Grzeskowiak, A; Baborska-Narozny, M Guidelines for disassembly and adaptation in architectural design compared to circular economy goals-A literature review(2023) | |
| 17088
|
Anastasiades, K; Goffin, J; Rinke, M; Buyle, M; Audenaert, A; Blom, J Standardisation: An essential enabler for the circular reuse of construction components? A trajectory for a cleaner European construction industry(2021) | |
| 16714
|
Anastasiades, K; Dockx, J; van den Berg, M; Rinke, M; Blom, J; Audenaert, A Stakeholder perceptions on implementing design for disassembly and standardisation for heterogeneous construction components(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41, 8 | |
| 13488
|
Kayaçetin, NC; Verdoodt, S; Lefevre, L; Versele, A Evaluation of Circular Construction Works During Design Phase: An Overview of Valuation Tools(2022) | |
| 22199
|
Askar, R; Braganca, L; Gervasio, H Design for Adaptability (DfA)-Frameworks and Assessment Models for Enhanced Circularity in Buildings(2022)Applied System Innovation, 5.0, 1 | |
| 22707
|
van Stijn, A; Eberhardt, LCM; Jansen, BW; Meijer, A Environmental design guidelines for circular building components based on LCA and MFA: Lessons from the circular kitchen and renovation facade(2022) | |
| 22329
|
Eberhardt, LCM; van Stijn, A; Stranddorf, LK; Birkved, M; Birgisdottir, H Environmental Design Guidelines for Circular Building Components: The Case of the Circular Building Structure(2021)Sustainability, 13.0, 10 | |
| 23189
|
Attia, S; Al-Obaidy, M; Mori, M; Campain, C; Giannasi, E; van Vliet, M; Gasparri, E Disassembly calculation criteria and methods for circular construction(2024) | |
| 876
|
Minunno, R; O'Grady, T; Morrison, GM; Gruner, RL; Colling, M Strategies for Applying the Circular Economy to Prefabricated Buildings(2018)Buildings, 8, 9 | |
| 2065
|
O'Grady, T; Minunno, R; Chong, HY; Morrison, GM Design for disassembly, deconstruction and resilience: A circular economy index for the built environment(2021) |