| Title | Benchmarking composting, anaerobic digestion and dark fermentation for apple vinasse management as a strategy for sustainable energy production |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 25691 |
| Authors | Estévez, S; Rebolledo-Leiva, R; Hernández, D; González-García, S; Feijoo, G; Moreira, MT |
| Title | Benchmarking composting, anaerobic digestion and dark fermentation for apple vinasse management as a strategy for sustainable energy production |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Looking for renewable energy sources is one of the main targets in the transition to low-carbon economies. Bioenergy appears as an alternative with great potential, but firstly, it requires addressing all aspects that can limit its environmental viability. Stillage has been identified as an environmental concern of the bioethanol production. Thus, eco-friendly strategies for valorizing this resource should be pursued. In this work, three strategies such as composting (non-energy valorization), one-stage anaerobic digestion (with the aim of biogas production), and dark fermentation followed by anaerobic digestion (scheme under development to produce biohydrogen and biogas) were evaluated under a life-cycle perspective; and through process modeling based on literature data. The aim is to identify the advantages and disadvantages of dark fermentation for the management of apple stillage. To do this, a cradle-to-gate and attributional framework were followed, considering impact and damage perspectives. Results showed a very significant environmental load (around 99%) of composting compared to the selected energy recovery schemes, considering the added value of compost and the associated emissions versus those of biofuels. Otherwise, small differences were found between single-stage anaerobic digestion and dark fermentation (up to 16%), mainly, due to changes in chemical consumption and organic matter degradation efficiency. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127319 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
10226
|
Ampese, LC; Sganzerla, WG; Ziero, HD; Costa, JM; Martins, G; Forster-Carneiro, T Valorization of apple pomace for biogas production: a leading anaerobic biorefinery approach for a circular bioeconomy(2024)Biomass Conversion And Biorefinery, 14, 13 | |
| 20463
|
de Oliveira, TCG; Sganzerla, WG; Ampese, LC; Sforça, BP; Goldbeck, R; Forster-Carneiro, T Sustainable valorization of apple waste in a biorefinery: a bibliometric analysis(2022)Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr, 16, 3 | |
| 10313
|
Blaszczyk, A; Sady, S; Pacholek, B; Jakubowska, D; Grzybowska-Brzezinska, M; Krzywonos, M; Popek, S Sustainable Management Strategies for Fruit Processing Byproducts for Biorefineries: A Review(2024)Sustainability, 16, 5 | |
| 29100
|
Kassongo, J; Shahsavari, E; Ball, AS Renewable energy from the solid-state anaerobic digestion of grape marc and cheese whey at high treatment capacity(2020) | |
| 16191
|
Garg, A; Basu, S; Shetti, NP; Bhattu, M; Alodhayb, AN; Pandiaraj, S Biowaste to bioenergy nexus: Fostering sustainability and circular economy(2024) | |
| 20655
|
da Rosa, RG; Sganzerla, WG; Buller, LS; Jimenez-Castro, MP; Gomes, KV; Timko, MT; Forster-Carneiro, T Sustainable Bioprocess Combining Fed-Batch Pretreatment Followed by Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Brewer's Spent Grains for Biomethane Production(2024)Bioenergy Research, 17, 1 | |
| 9170
|
Ortiz-Sanchez, M; Inocencio-García, PJ; Alzate-Ramírez, AF; Alzate, CAC Potential and Restrictions of Food-Waste Valorization through Fermentation Processes(2023)Fermentation-Basel, 9.0, 3 | |
| 13384
|
Tena, M; Buller, LS; Sganzerla, WG; Berni, M; Forster-Carneiro, T; Solera, R; Pérez, M Techno-economic evaluation of bioenergy production from anaerobic digestion of by-products from ethanol flex plants(2022) | |
| 63278
|
Vukusic, JL; Millenautzki, T; Barbe, S Bridging the Implementation Gap between Pomace Waste and Large-Scale Baker's Yeast Production(2023)Agriengineering, 5, 4 | |
| 8696
|
Hungría, J; Siles, JA; Chica, AF; Gil, A; Martín, MA Anaerobic co-digestion of winery waste: comparative assessment of grape marc waste and lees derived from organic crops(2021)Environmental Technology, 42.0, 23 |