| Title | Techno-economic analysis of a succinic acid biorefinery coproducing acetic acid and dimethyl ether |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 26444 |
| Authors | Ghayur, A; Verheyen, TV; Meuleman, E |
| Title | Techno-economic analysis of a succinic acid biorefinery coproducing acetic acid and dimethyl ether |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The production of platform chemicals via carbon negative technologies will play an important role in global efforts to mitigate climate change. Succinic acid biorefineries are commercially mature carbon negative technologies that are plagued with large waste streams in the form of hemicellulose and gypsum. Here, a techno-economic analysis assesses the viability of a succinic acid biorefinery wherein hemicellulose is converted to acetic acid and dimethyl ether, and gypsum generation is avoided. Succinic acid is a feedstock for biodegradable plastics, acetic acid replaces petroleum-derived sources, and dimethyl ether is ideally suited as an energy storage vector. Our novel biorefinery concept presents an innovative integration of commercial technologies including water-splitting bipolar membrane electrodialysis for acid purification. The modelled multiproduct biorefinery (Multi Case) annually consumes 650,000 metric tonnes (t) of pulp logs, 135,000t of methanol, 1,700,000t of water, 42,000t of CO2 and 89 MW of electricity to produce 220,000t of succinic acid, 115,000t of acetic acid and 900t of dimethyl ether. All the parasitic electricity and heat duties are fulfilled within the biorefinery. Results show a CAPEX of AUD $635,000,000, OPEX of $180,000,000 and a succinic acid Minimum Selling Price of $990/t. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of the Multi Case biorefinery model show it is also resilient to price fluctuations. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
13973
|
Bello, S; Ladakis, D; Gonzalez-Garcia, S; Feijoo, G; Koutinas, A; Moreira, MT Renewable carbon opportunities in the production of succinic acid applying attributional and consequential modelling(2022) | |
| 12414
|
Baena-Moreno, FM; Pastor-Pérez, L; Zhang, ZE; Reina, TR Stepping towards a low-carbon economy. Formic acid from biogas as case of study(2020) | |
| 8991
|
Sadare, OO; Ejekwu, O; Moshokoa, MF; Jimoh, MO; Daramola, MO Membrane Purification Techniques for Recovery of Succinic Acid Obtained from Fermentation Broth during Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Current Advances and Future Perspectives(2021)Sustainability, 13.0, 12 | |
| 25229
|
Ghayur, A; Verheyen, TV Modelling a biorefinery concept producing carbon fibre-polybutylene succinate composite foam(2019) | |
| 67488
|
Ioannidou, SM; Filippi, K; Kookos, IK; Koutinas, A; Ladakis, D Techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of a biorefinery using winery waste streams for the production of succinic acid and value-added co-products(2022) | |
| 27915
|
Bose, A; O'Shea, R; Lin, RC; Long, A; Rajendran, K; Wall, D; De, S; Murphy, JD The marginal abatement cost of co-producing biomethane, food and biofertiliser in a circular economy system(2022) | |
| 21173
|
Khan, MA; Abbas, A; Dickson, R A strategy for commercialization of macroalga biorefineries(2023) | |
| 15665
|
Bello, S; Méndez-Trelles, P; Rodil, E; Feijoo, G; Moreira, MT Towards improving the sustainability of bioplastics: Process modelling and life cycle assessment of two separation routes for 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid(2020) | |
| 68473
|
Chandel, AK; Albarelli, JQ; Santos, DT; Chundawat, SPS; Puri, M; Meireles, MAA Comparative analysis of key technologies for cellulosic ethanol production from Brazilian sugarcane bagasse at a commercial scale(2019)Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr, 13, 4 |