| Title | Wastewater treatment decentralization: Is this the right direction for megacities in the Global South? |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 26671 |
| Authors | Torre, A; Vazquez-Rowe, I; Parodi, E; Kahhat, R |
| Title | Wastewater treatment decentralization: Is this the right direction for megacities in the Global South? |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The centralization-decentralization dichotomy in wastewater treatment management has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the urban context. The escalation of environmental hazards linked to increasing mismanaged wastewater flows in emerging or developing cities has vivified this conundrum. It is argued that there is a wide range of parameters to identify the optimal level of centralization-decentralization that must be implemented. In many cases, this prevents decision-makers from having a clear picture of the most appropriate management choices that must be undertaken. Hence, the main objective of the current discussion consists of an indepth comparison between centralized wastewater treatment systems and decentralized systems with source separation in urban environments of the Global South. Moreover, a set of actions that should be considered in order to upgrade wastewater treatment systems amidst the existence of numerous economic, social and environmental constraints are analyzed. Considering the constraints of megacentralization as a preferred option, we argue that decision-makers should restrain from entering a centralization-decentralization dichotomy, seeing the process as a gradient between the two concepts. In fact, we advocate combining the benefits of each of the two perspectives to generate an adaptive management, site-specific solution for urban environments. For this, the inclusion of quantitative management tools, such as life-cycle environmental or cost management methodologies, in multi-objective optimization models, constitutes an interesting path forward towards fostering comprehensive policy support. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
25582
|
Pasciucco, F; Pecorini, I; Iannelli, R Planning the centralization level in wastewater collection and treatment: A review of assessment methods(2022) | |
| 23375
|
Ribarova, I; Vasilaki, V; Katsou, E Review of linear and circular approaches to on-site domestic wastewater treatment: Analysis of research achievements, trends and distance to target(2024) | |
| 3181
|
Masi, E; Rizzo, A; Regelsberger, M The role of constructed wetlands in a new circular economy, resource oriented, and ecosystem services paradigm(2018) | |
| 12240
|
Estévez, S; González-García, S; Feijoo, G; Moreira, MT How decentralized treatment can contribute to the symbiosis between environmental protection and resource recovery(2022) | |
| 10403
|
Cipolletta, G; Ozbayram, EG; Eusebi, AL; Akyol, Ç; Malamis, S; Mino, E; Fatone, F Policy and legislative barriers to close water-related loops in innovative small water and wastewater systems in Europe: A critical analysis(2021) | |
| 23133
|
Al-Azzawi, MSM; Gondhalekar, D; Drewes, JE Neighborhood-Scale Urban Water Reclamation with Integrated Resource Recovery for Establishing Nexus City in Munich, Germany: Pipe Dream or Reality?(2022)Resources-Basel, 11, 7 | |
| 14465
|
Pasciucco, F; Pecorini, I; Iannelli, R Centralization of wastewater treatment in a tourist area: A comparative LCA considering the impact of seasonal changes(2023) | |
| 67454
|
Opher, T; Friedler, E; Shapira, A Comparative life cycle sustainability assessment of urban water reuse at various centralization scales(2019)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 7 | |
| 14557
|
Vij, S; Moors, E; Kujawa-Roeleveld, K; Lindeboom, REF; Singh, T; de Kreuk, MK From pea soup to water factories: wastewater paradigms in India and the Netherlands(2021) | |
| 7939
|
Masi, F; Langergraber, G; Santoni, M; Istenic, D; Atanasova, N; Buttiglieri, G Possibilities of nature-based and hybrid decentralized solutions for reclaimed water reuse(2020) |