Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Quantity, Components, and Value of Waste Materials Landfilled in the United States
ID_Doc 26750
Authors Powell, JT; Chertow, MR
Title Quantity, Components, and Value of Waste Materials Landfilled in the United States
Year 2019
Published Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 23, 2
Abstract The current system of production and consumption needs end-of-life disposal to function, but the linkage between upstream production-consumption with the downstream landfill as terminus is, at best, a tenuous, one-way relationship, suggesting a partial system failure. A starting point to fix this link is to confront, systematically, the messy "black box" that is mixed waste landfilling, interrogate its contents locally, and determine a baseline that can be used to scale up results. Here, we develop a detailed model characterizing landfilled municipal solid waste (MSW) in the United States across the dimensions of material quantity, quality, location, and time. The model triangulates measurements spanning 1,161 landfills (representing up to 95% of landfilled MSW) and 15,169 solid waste samples collected and analyzed at 222 sites across the United States. We confirm that landfilled quantities of paper (63 million megagrams [Mg]), food waste (35 million Mg), plastic (32 million Mg, textiles (10 million Mg), and electronic waste (3.5 million Mg) are far larger than computed by previous top-down U.S. government estimates. We estimate the cost of MSW landfill disposal in 2015 (10.7 billion U.S. dollars [USD]) and gross lost commodity value of recyclable material (1.4 billion USD). Further, we estimate landfill methane emissions to be up to 14% greater (mass basis) than the 2015 U.S. inventory. By principally relying on measurements of waste quantity and type that are recorded annually, the model can inform more effective, targeted interventions to divert waste materials from landfill disposal, improve local, regional, and national emission estimates, enhance dissipative loss estimates in material flow analyses, and illuminate the dynamics linking material, energy, and economic dimensions to production, consumption, and disposal cycles.
PDF https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jiec.12752

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
22476 Li, X; Chertow, M; Guo, SJ; Johnson, E; Jiang, DQ Estimating non-hazardous industrial waste generation by sector, location, and year in the United States: A methodological framework and case example of spent foundry sand(2020)
19793 Anshassi, M; Preuss, B; Townsend, TG Moving beyond recycling: Examining steps for local government to integrate sustainable materials management(2021)Journal Of The Air & Waste Management Association, 71.0, 8
22182 Chen, DMC; Bodirsky, BL; Krueger, T; Mishra, A; Popp, A The world's growing municipal solid waste: trends and impacts(2020)Environmental Research Letters, 15.0, 7
5862 Hemali, NA; De Alwis, AAP; Wijesundara, M; Edirisinghe, LGLM A method for determining the recycling value of unprocessed municipal solid waste in one cubic meter waste composition analysis technique(2024)
24547 Zink, T; Geyer, R Material Recycling and the Myth of Landfill Diversion(2019)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 23, 3
2391 Vines, V; Pasquali, M; Ganguli, S; Meyer, DE Understanding the trade-offs of national municipal solid waste estimation methods for circular economy policy(2023)
28017 Maalouf, A; Mavropoulos, A Re-assessing global municipal solid waste generation(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41.0, 4
7662 Bourtsalas, AC; Shen, TX; Tian, YX A Comprehensive Assessment of Products Management and Energy Recovery from Waste Products in the United States(2022)Energies, 15, 18
21716 Lugo, M; Ail, SS; Castaldi, MJ Approaching a zero-waste strategy by reuse in New York City: Challenges and potential(2020)Waste Management & Research, 38.0, 7
19560 Anshassi, M; Smallwood, T; Townsend, TGG Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations(2022)
Scroll