| Title | Climate mitigation efficacy of anaerobic digestion in a decarbonising economy |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 26806 |
| Authors | Styles, D; Yesufu, J; Bowman, M; Williams, AP; Duffy, C; Luyckx, K |
| Title | Climate mitigation efficacy of anaerobic digestion in a decarbonising economy |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Anaerobic digestion (AD) is at the interface of biowaste management, energy generation, food production and land-based carbon dioxide removal. Strategic deployment of AD requires careful scoping of interactions with prospective alternative biowaste management, energy generation technologies and land uses to ensure effective delivery of climate neutrality and circularity. There remains a need to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation efficacy of AD in the context of future alternative (counterfactual) processes associated with differential rates of decarbonisation across energy, waste management and land (including agriculture) sectors. To address this gap, prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied to AD deployment scenarios across three decarbonisation contexts, using the UK as an example. Food waste prevention and diversion to animal feed always achieve more GHG mitigation than AD, even with sustainable intensification of food and feed production. Compared with maize- or grass-biomethane transport fuel, solar electricity generation can avoid 16 times more fossil energy and afforestation can mitigate six times more GHG per hectare of land occupied. Transport biomethane is currently the most effective biogas use for GHG mitigation, but large-scale combustion of biogas for electricity or industrial heat generation is the most effective long-term option as transport is electrified and bioenergy carbon capture & storage (BECCS) is deployed. Prioritising waste prevention and diversion to animal feed (including via insect meal) instead of maximising AD deployment could simultaneously: offset an additional 10-15% of national GHG emissions; meet an additional 2-4% of national energy demand; free enough arable land to provide 20-21% of national recommended protein and kcal intake. However, AD is likely to remain the best option to manage substantial volumes of residual food wastes and manures that will remain available even if ambitious projections on waste prevention and diet change are realised. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
10389
|
Pérez-Camacho, MN; Curry, R; Cromie, T Life cycle environmental impacts of substituting food wastes for traditional anaerobic digestion feedstocks(2018) | |
| 22196
|
Slorach, PC; Jeswani, HK; Cuéllar-Franca, R; Azapagic, A Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste(2019) | |
| 28913
|
Slorach, PC; Jeswani, HK; Cuéllar-Franca, R; Azapagic, A Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy(2019) | |
| 69590
|
Zhang, H; Liu, G; Xue, L; Zuo, J; Chen, T; Vuppaladadiyam, A; Duan, HB Anaerobic digestion based waste-to-energy technologies can halve the climate impact of China's fast-growing food waste by 2040(2020) | |
| 5605
|
Subbarao, PMV; D'Silva, TC; Adlak, K; Kumar, S; Chandra, R; Vijay, VK Anaerobic digestion as a sustainable technology for efficiently utilizing biomass in the context of carbon neutrality and circular economy(2023) | |
| 24951
|
Mehta, N; Anderson, A; Johnston, CR; Rooney, DW Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study(2022) | |
| 16653
|
Ingrao, C; Faccilongo, N; Di Gioia, L; Messineo, A Food waste recovery into energy in a circular economy perspective: A comprehensive review of aspects related to plant operation and environmental assessment(2018) | |
| 13436
|
Valenti, F; Liao, W; Porto, SMC Life cycle assessment of agro-industrial by-product reuse: a comparison between anaerobic digestion and conventional disposal treatments(2020)Green Chemistry, 22, 20 | |
| 8593
|
Cecchi, F; Cavinato, C Smart Approaches to Food Waste Final Disposal(2019)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 16.0, 16 | |
| 6757
|
Oldfield, TL; White, E; Holden, NM An environmental analysis of options for utilising wasted food and food residue(2016) |